i think no because most of them don't want slaves to be their representative true but then u just have to think of wat they did befor to ge there bc u could be unsaved
In addition to the Three-Fifths Compromise, the Constitutional Convention also reached the Slave Trade Compromise. This agreement allowed the importation of enslaved people to continue for twenty years after the ratification of the Constitution, after which Congress could legislate against it. This compromise aimed to balance the interests of Southern states, which relied on slavery for their economy, with the growing abolitionist sentiments in the North.
The disagreements and compromises finalizing the constitution were representation (The Great Compromise), slavery (Three-Fifths Compromise), and elections (Electoral College).
yes it is true
The Missouri Compromise was the first attempt to ease the looming crisis over slavery. It effectively prevented the spread of slavery into new states but did nothing to eliminate slavery in current slave states.
The Three-Fifths Compromise was necessary as it aimed to balance the interests of both pro-slavery and anti-slavery delegates during the Constitutional Convention. Pro-slavery delegates wanted enslaved individuals counted for representation in Congress to gain more political power, while anti-slavery delegates opposed this, arguing that enslaved people should not be counted as citizens. The compromise allowed for enslaved individuals to be counted as three-fifths of a person, which helped to maintain a delicate balance between northern and southern states and facilitated the ratification of the Constitution. This agreement, however, reflected the deep divisions and moral compromises surrounding the issue of slavery in the early United States.
The overriding issue was slavery. The compromise included The Fugitive Slave Act and agreement to allow slavery within the borders of Missouri.
The main compromise in the original US Constitution was about slavery, which was permitted in some states and prohibited in others.
In addition to the Three-Fifths Compromise, the Constitutional Convention also reached the Slave Trade Compromise. This agreement allowed the importation of enslaved people to continue for twenty years after the ratification of the Constitution, after which Congress could legislate against it. This compromise aimed to balance the interests of Southern states, which relied on slavery for their economy, with the growing abolitionist sentiments in the North.
Missouri Compromise
The overriding issue was slavery. The compromise included The Fugitive Slave Act and agreement to allow slavery within the borders of Missouri.
Missouri Compromise
The disagreements and compromises finalizing the constitution were representation (The Great Compromise), slavery (Three-Fifths Compromise), and elections (Electoral College).
Not battle, but a debate. The Missouri Compromise of 1820.
When delegates agreed to the compromise, they gained a balanced approach to contentious issues, such as representation and slavery, which facilitated the drafting of the Constitution. This compromise allowed for a more unified agreement among states with differing interests, promoting collaboration and reducing tensions. Ultimately, it helped establish a framework for governance that addressed both the needs of larger and smaller states, paving the way for the ratification of the Constitution.
The court ruled that slavery was protected by the constitution, so the Missouri Compromise (which banned slavery North of a certain parallel) was invalid.
i think no because most of them don't want slaves to be their representative true but then u just have to think of wat they did befor to ge there bc u could be unsaved
The court ruled that slavery was protected by the constitution, so the Missouri Compromise (which banned slavery North of a certain parallel) was invalid.