Marbury v. Madison, (1803) is often cited as the case that affirmed the Supreme Court's right of judicial review. Marbury is the first case in which the US Supreme Court declared an act of Congress unconstitutional (Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789).
Case Citation:
Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Marbury v. Madison is the Supreme Court case that confirmed that the federal courts have the authority to declare laws unconstitutional. It did not necessarily create or establish the power as much as it confirmed that it is inherent in the power of the judicial branch even though it is not specifically stated in the Constitution.
This was devised by Chief Justice John Marshall (former secretary of state to John Adams) when he declared parts of the Judiciary act of 1789 unconstitutional.
William Marbury had been elected as a judge by Adams in the Judiciary act of 1801, but he was not commissioned by Marshall in time. When Jefferson became president (March, 4, 1801), his secretary of state, James Madison, did not deliver the commission under the new Democratic-Republican party. This pushed Marbury to turn to the Supreme court where he petitioned for a writ of mandamus (an order to force Madison to deliver his commission).
Marshall's opinion was that Marbury deserved his commission, but knew Jefferson would not serve him even if it was mandated. Marshall did not want the Supreme Court to be weakened, and instead gave it strength by declaring parts of the Judiciary Act of 1789 unconstitutional - the part where the Supreme Court could issue a writ of mandamus.
Therefore, he allowed Jefferson to feel like a winner, but at the same time set a precedent for all future cases and established Judicial Review, the ability of the Supreme Court to declare a federal law of Congress as unconstitutional.
Case Citation:
Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)
Marbury v. Madison, (1803) is often cited as the case that affirmed the Supreme Court's right of judicial review. Marbury is the first case in which the US Supreme Court declared an act of Congress unconstitutional (Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789).
Case Citation:
Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
The judicial power to decide whether a law is constitutional.
Marbury vs Madison was an ingenious decision. Marbury vs Madison was the first case of judicial review that voided the act of congress.
Marbury v. Madison
Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803) is often credited with establishing the right of judicial review, which increased the Court's power and made it more equal to the other branches of government. Judicial review allows the Supreme Court to determine whether legislation is unconstitutional and to overturn those laws.For more in-depth information on Marbury v. Madison (1803), see Related Links, below.
From the case of Marbury v. Madison
Marbury vs. Madison established the precedent of judicial review. Marbury vs. Madison was heard in 1803 before the US Supreme court.
Establish Judicial Review.
The judicial power to decide whether a law is constitutional.
Judicial Review
The principle of judicial review, that is, the ability of judges to declare laws unconstitutional.
The principle of judicial review, that is, the ability of judges to declare laws unconstitutional.
Marbury v. Madison is the Supreme Court case that established the precedent of judicial review. John Marshall was the Chief Justice of the court.
Marbury v. Madison established the practice of judicial review.
John Marshall established the principle of judicial review in Marbury v. Madison.
Marbury vs Madison was an ingenious decision. Marbury vs Madison was the first case of judicial review that voided the act of congress.
Judicial Review
The precedent of judicial review, as established in the Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison, affected checks and balances by giving the judicial branch the power to interpret the laws passed by the executive and legislative branches. It also gave the court the power to determine the constitutionality of laws.