Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
They didn't. In a true Democracy, there would be no need for representitives of the people. Instead, they made the selection of political canidates more beaurucratic, as Joe shmo stands little chance of running or being elected.
Pumpkin
They were reforms to make the government more democratic
Of course. If you don't think so make a visit to communist China, Russia, or other countries that are not democratic.
Freemasons do all govermental policy. They rule the whole world.
because everybody voted on the democratic side which is, jacksons.
because everybody voted on the democratic side which is, jacksons.
A democratic republican
well the purpose of a democratic government is ti represent the people and make the best decision for the people. I'm guessing by saying us you mean the United States of America and the US government is democratic.
He encouraged the idea
Democracy (democratic)
The heavy participation of the military in the executive and legislative branches of government and the repression of non-approved opposition forces.
They didn't. In a true Democracy, there would be no need for representitives of the people. Instead, they made the selection of political canidates more beaurucratic, as Joe shmo stands little chance of running or being elected.
A (Democratic) Republic.
There are many things that make the Saudi Arabian government non democratic. The government handles issues without any consultation and policies are formulated in a dictatorial manner.
democratic
Pumpkin