answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The importance of Gibbons v. Ogden was that Congress used its power to control commerce between states. If one company (Ogden's company) was given a monopoly over the Hudson River, it would have significantly hindered trade along the east coast.

Gibbons v. Ogden was the first case to address use of the Interstate Commerce Clause, leading to an expansion in regional travel and business. This decision allowed landlocked states access to US waterways and improved economic opportunity.

Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)

I would argue that the Gibbons v Ogden decision was not about nationalism; rather, it was a reaffirmation of Federalism over states' rights. In the period between 1800 and 1830, there are a number of instances of a "loss" for states which goes all the way back to the succession of the Constitution over the Articles of Confederation. In Gibbons v Ogden, the power to regulate interstate commerce was given to Congress and any meddling by New York State was relinquished.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

As a Federalist, Marshall exerted great influence over the other members of the Court to support national supremacy over state sovereignty. The Supreme Court's decision in Gibbons used the Interstate Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3), Article I, Section 9, and the Supremacy Clause to prevent states from subordinating the federal government to state laws.

The Marshall Court consistently adhered to the nationalist definition of federal power, asserting constitutional and federal law had supremacy over state law. While many saw this as undermining state sovereignty, which it did, the Court's decisions tended to benefit the nation as a whole, whereas state statutes were designed to benefit and create income only for the individual state. For example, the ruling in Gibbons v. Ogden ended local and state regulations impeding interstate commerce, which had resulted in a form of protectionism for each state that inhibited the growth of a national economy.

This case rested on interpretation of enumerated powers and their application.

Case Citation:

Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How did the decision in Gibbons v. Ogden help promote commerce?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What was an effect of the historical decision of Gibbons Ogden?

regulating commerce under one uniform law


What was an effect of the historical decision of Gibbons v Ogden?

regulating commerce under one uniform law


Which marshall court decision established the right of federal government to regulate interstate commerce?

Gibbons v. Ogden


How did The decision in Gibson's vs. Ogden basically addressed what issue?

The decision in Gibbons v. Ogden addressed the issue of whether states have the authority to regulate interstate commerce or if that power belongs exclusively to the federal government. The ruling established that regulating interstate commerce is a federal power under the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution.


In which case did the Marshall Court regulate interstate commerce?

Gibbons v. Ogden


Do you agree with Marshall's ruling that Gibbons had a right to compete with Ogden's ferry line?

Yes, Marshall's ruling in Gibbons v. Ogden affirmed that the federal government, not the states, had the authority to regulate interstate commerce, including ferry services. This decision established a precedent for federal regulation of commerce and laid the foundation for the expansion of federal power in regulating the economy.


Affirmed the federal government's right to control interstate commerce?

Gibbons v. Ogden


What was a result of Gibbons v. Ogden?

The result of Gibbons v. Ogden was a landmark Supreme Court decision that established federal power over interstate commerce. The ruling clarified that the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution granted the federal government authority to regulate trade between states, leading to a broad interpretation of federal power in regulating economic activities.


Was Gibbons v Ogden the only case in Supreme Court history that went without a decision?

The US Supreme Court made a decision in the case of Gibbons v. Ogden, (1824). See Related Questions, below, for a discussion of that decision.


Why did Aaron Ogden sue a man riding a steamboat on a NY waterway?

Aaron Ogden sued Thomas Gibbons for operating a steamboat on a waterway in New York because Ogden held a monopoly license granted by the state to operate steamboats on that route, and he believed Gibbons was infringing on his exclusive rights. The case, Gibbons v. Ogden, ultimately led to a landmark Supreme Court decision affirming the federal government's authority to regulate interstate commerce.


Gibbons vs Ogden was a Supreme Court Case in 1824 that was the first to address the?

The commerce clause


What case resulted in the supreme court in a ruling the grant congress board powers over interstate commerce?

Gibbons v. Ogden is the name of the case that resulted in the Supreme Court in a ruling that grants Congress board powers over interstate commerce.