The Phalanx was a massive formation of heavily armed foot soldiers. This required long hours of drill. Shared training created a strong sense of unity among citizen- soldiers.
Aristocratic leaders risked losing the support of their army if they did not consider the interests of the phalanx. with some many city-states, great political variety characterized the Greek world
Greek.
The Greek city states treated the government independently. This was because they knew that the city had its independent way of governing and government. It became very effecting in counteracting the politics at the time.
Cleisthens encouraged people to participate in government.
citizens in ancient Greek city-states developed ideas about representation and establish direct democracy
In a phalanx, the hoplites (heavily armed foot soldiers) were made up of Aristocrats and non-aristocrats. This led to controversy in the government, because the non-aristocrats thought, why are we equal in battle but not in the political or social society? This brought about changes in the government by making new laws, and leveling out the "classes" of society. They became almost like equals.
Only if you were Spartan. I suppose, though, that you could say that because the phalanx was such an effective formation, that it made Greek armies for effective and thus, more powerful. You can take the Battle of Thermopylae as proof of concept. Powerful armies made the citizens feel secure and made cities like Athens more likely to expand into neighboring territories.
About 500 to 600 people were in a Phalanx.
Aristocratic leaders risked losing the support of their army if they did not consider the interests of the phalanx. with some many city-states, great political variety characterized the Greek world
The phalanx were the backbone of the Ancient Greek armies.As soon as the enemy saw the phalanx approach, they knew they would be defeated.
The Romans eliminated the Greek phalanx and replaced it with the maniple, which was a looser, more mobile fighting unit.The Romans eliminated the Greek phalanx and replaced it with the maniple, which was a looser, more mobile fighting unit.The Romans eliminated the Greek phalanx and replaced it with the maniple, which was a looser, more mobile fighting unit.The Romans eliminated the Greek phalanx and replaced it with the maniple, which was a looser, more mobile fighting unit.The Romans eliminated the Greek phalanx and replaced it with the maniple, which was a looser, more mobile fighting unit.The Romans eliminated the Greek phalanx and replaced it with the maniple, which was a looser, more mobile fighting unit.The Romans eliminated the Greek phalanx and replaced it with the maniple, which was a looser, more mobile fighting unit.The Romans eliminated the Greek phalanx and replaced it with the maniple, which was a looser, more mobile fighting unit.The Romans eliminated the Greek phalanx and replaced it with the maniple, which was a looser, more mobile fighting unit.
phalanx
He was important to Greek society because he was the king of Macedonia. He conquered the Persian Empire.
idk someone answer this questionIt did and it was just the mass of men that was an unstopping power that no one could rival on the battlefield also like the greek states themselves
. . . a Phalanx .
Sparta
. . . a Phalanx .