0
How does Chief Justice Earl Warren use historical evidence to support the Supreme Court's opinion?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
He refers to the increasing success of African American society since the 19th centenary
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why would a Supreme Court justice write a concurring opinion?
A Supreme Court justice may choose to write a concurring opinion when he or she agrees with the majority decision, but wants to add perceptions or legal reasoning not addressed, or not addressed to that justice's satisfaction, in the majority opinion (opinion of the Court).
Who wrote the us supreme court's majority opinion in the 1973 miller v California case?
Chief Justice Warren Burger
How do you abbreviate Justice of the Supreme Court?
When the meaning of the abbreviation can be understood in context (for example, in the text of an opinion), the abbreviation is simply "J." In academic writing or journalism, the Supreme Court of the United States is identified, and the justices are then referred to as "Justice" or "Chief Justice," rather than by the Court's standard abbreviation, shown above.
What is the explanation given by justices who do not agree with the decision of the majority?
No. If a Supreme Court justice disagrees with the decision and wants to make his or her opinion a matter of public and judicial record, the justice must write a dissenting opinion.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
How do judicial reviews in the majority opinion differ from those in the dissent?
The majority opinion uses lower courts' decisions on the same case as evidence
. What does it mean when a Supreme Court justice issues a dissenting opinion?
When a Supreme Court "dissents" it is disagreeing with the majority opinion.
What does mean when a supreme court justice issues a dissenting opinion?
When a Supreme Court "dissents" it is disagreeing with the majority opinion.
One a Supreme Court Justice disagrees with the majority opinion of the court what is he or she doing?
A US Supreme Court justice who disagrees with the majority opinion writes a dissenting opinion, explaining why he or she disagrees with the majority.
Why would a Supreme Court justice write a concurring opinion?
A Supreme Court justice may choose to write a concurring opinion when he or she agrees with the majority decision, but wants to add perceptions or legal reasoning not addressed, or not addressed to that justice's satisfaction, in the majority opinion (opinion of the Court).
An opinion written by a Supreme Court Justice who disagrees with the outcome of a case is called a?
dissenting opinion
A justice of the supreme court may write a dissenting opinion to?
add points to the majority opinion
What does a US Supreme Court justice write when agreeing with the majority?
A concurring opinion
An opinion written by a Supreme Court justice who agrees with a case but does not agree with its legal logic is called a?
concurring opinion
What is an opinion written by a US Supreme Court justice who agrees with the minority opinion?
The term "minority opinion" is a bit unorthodox, considering those who vote against the majority may not be unified in their reasoning. When a Supreme Court justice wants to express disagreement with the opinion of the Court (usually the majority), he or she may write a dissenting opinion. It is not necessary for the dissenting justice to agree with anyone else on the Court.
What references does Chief Justice Earl Warren make support the Supreme Court's opinion?
Laws & ruling.
What references does chief justice earl warren make to support the supreme courts opinion?
Laws & ruling.
What references does chef justice earl warren make to support the supreme court's opinion?
Justice Earl Warren in his opinions often referenced the Constitution and previous Supreme Court decisions to support the Court's opinion. He relied on legal precedents, such as landmark cases and constitutional provisions, to justify the Court's interpretation and application of the law. Additionally, he sometimes referred to historical events and societal norms to provide context and rationale for the Court's rulings.
