0
How has the supreme court decisions affected the rights of accused people?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
This is more commonly known as expanding the right of the accused. One of the most famous ways the rights of the accused were strengthened was through requiring the accused to have their rights explained to them. "You have the right to remain silent, anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law..." are now famous words well known throughout the country.
Tomasa Okuneva
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoThe two most significant cases would be Miranda v. Arizona (decided June 13, 1966) & Escobedo v. Illinois (decided June 22, 1964).
The so-called "Miranda rights" are read to those arrested, advising them of their right to counsel and right not to incriminate themselves. This effectively superceded the Escobedo decision, which had extended the right to counsel to those who are not arrested or formally indicted, but are nonetheless subjected to interrogation. Earlier, the case Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) had established that state courts had to provide legal counsel to those who could not afford it.
Wiki User
∙ 10y agoThis is more commonly known as expanding the right of the accused. One of the most famous ways the rights of the accused were strengthened was through requiring the accused to have their rights explained to them. "You have the right to remain silent, anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law..." are now famous words well known throughout the country.
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoit gave rights to people like the right to remain silent (you don't have to answer if you don't want to) and the right to a lawyer
Sweet Brownies
gives the accused some rights
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are 2 major external influences on supreme court judicial decision making?
Public Opinion is a huge one. Since the eye of the people is so close on the Supreme Court given the consequences of its decisions, there is evidence that the Supreme Court is affected by the will of the people. Also, amicus briefs can influence Supreme Court votes.
How did the Supreme Court reinterpret civil liberties in Gideon v. Wainwright?
it established that states must provide people accused of crimes with access to an attorney
How have the townspeople been affected by the last several months of court proceedings?
Many of the townspeople have been affected by the court proceedings by being arrested or hanged. The others live in constant fear of being accused. The people live in chaos.
What type of people are tried by the US Supreme Court and how does the Supreme Court accept such cases?
The Supreme Court is the highest appellate court in the United States. It does not try cases, in the standard sense of the word, but only reviews lower court decisions. Usually, cases heard by the Supreme Court involve issues of Constitutional law or federal legislation.
What did the Supreme Court decide in Miranda v. Arizona?
People accused of a crime must be informed of their rights : Apex
What are 2 major external influences on supreme court judicial decision making?
Public Opinion is a huge one. Since the eye of the people is so close on the Supreme Court given the consequences of its decisions, there is evidence that the Supreme Court is affected by the will of the people. Also, amicus briefs can influence Supreme Court votes.
Which group is most affected by the rights and protection listed in the table?
people accused of crime
what did the supreme court decide in Miranda VS Arizona ?
people accused of a crime must be informed of their rights
What did people accuse Young Franklin D Roosevelt of being?
FDR was accused of becoming a dictator after trying to change the Supreme Court for his advantage.
The MIranda decision of the supreme court concerned?
The Miranda decision of the Supreme Court was concerned with police informed the accused of their rights when they are arrested. They are called Miranda Rights.
Which principle explains why all people all people including government officials have to follow decisions made by the US Supreme Court?
The principle that explains why all people, including government officials, have to follow decisions made by the US Supreme Court is known as judicial review. In the case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803, the Supreme Court established its power to interpret the Constitution and declare laws and actions unconstitutional. This gives the Court the final say on legal disputes and its decisions are binding on all branches of government and institutions throughout the United States.
How did the Supreme Court reinterpret civil liberties in Gideon v. Wainwright?
it established that states must provide people accused of crimes with access to an attorney
How did the Supreme Court unite the US?
It's job is not to unite, but to interpret law to see if it is constitutional. There will always be people who agree or disagree with its decisions.
Who are the stakeholders of a small business?
Stakeholders of any business are people affected by the decisions the particular business makes. It can be the owners, employees, customers, suppliers, people living in the area...
Stakeholders of a business?
people that are interested in the business, ( customer, employees, competitors e.t.c)
Why were the supreme court decisions significant?
The decisions change law and the constitution. Because of the Supreme Court people have their rights read to them, schools are intergraded, it is against the law to discriminate because of age, sex, race, religion, or sexual orientation. There are rules on search and seizure for evidence and what can be introduced in court. These are just a few examples.
How have the townspeople been affected by the last several months of court proceedings?
Many of the townspeople have been affected by the court proceedings by being arrested or hanged. The others live in constant fear of being accused. The people live in chaos.
