i don`t know thats what i was asking you
Parliamentary democracy
contributed to the developmentn of representative democracy
contributed to the development of representative democracy
France experienced a revolution that overthrew its monarchy during the French Revolution, which began in 1789. The revolution led to the establishment of the First French Republic in 1792, replacing the absolute monarchy with a representative government. This significant political shift was marked by the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, which emphasized individual rights and democratic ideals. The revolution had a profound impact on France and inspired similar movements across Europe and beyond.
In the late 1600s, both England and France were characterized by strong monarchies, but their governance structures differed significantly. England had a constitutional monarchy, where the power of the king was limited by Parliament, reflecting a growing emphasis on parliamentary democracy. In contrast, France practiced absolute monarchy under Louis XIV, who centralized power and ruled without significant legislative constraints. This fundamental difference shaped their political cultures and approaches to governance during that period.
Parliamentary democracy
It is similar to a constitutional monarchy.
Direct democracy and representative democracy are similar in that both involve citizens participating in the decision-making process of government. However, in direct democracy, citizens directly vote on laws and policies, while in representative democracy, citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf.
They are not very similar.
A constitutional monarchy with bicameral parliament, similar to that of the UK.
A constitutional monarchy is most similar to a parliamentary democracy, as both systems feature a head of state (the monarch) and a head of government (the prime minister) who operates within the framework of a constitution. This allows for a balance of power where the elected parliament holds significant authority, while the monarch's powers are largely ceremonial. Countries like the United Kingdom and Sweden exemplify this relationship, where the monarchy coexists with democratic governance. Additionally, constitutional monarchies often share similarities with republics that have ceremonial presidents, as both emphasize the separation of powers and the rule of law.
Yes, it has a constitution, that is why it a constitutional monarchy. But it is not one document but a collection. It is similar to Englands.
Jordan is a constitutional monarchy, similar to Denmark and the United Kingdom.
It was not - it was direct democracy where the citizens met in fortnightly assembly and decided on issues which the council implemented. Modern democracy is representative democracy, where elected representatives carry out the functions of governance.
Japan is a parliamentary constitutional monarchy similar to the UK, Canada, Sweden or Belgium. The Emperor is the head of state and keeps strictly out of politics.
Spain is a parliamentary monarchy.Spain is a Democratic Monarchy. It has a King, Juan Carlos I, who has very little power and is the Head of State. It has a democratically elected government which in turn elects a Presidente del Gobierno. The President governs the nation and is Head of Government. The current President is Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero.
contributed to the developmentn of representative democracy