The seventeen article constitution differs from most modern constitutions in that it did not establish the Japanese system of government, but rather outlined values and philosophies which the Japanese people were encouraged to live by.
Chat with our AI personalities
Yes it Does. Like any other State in the U.S its constitution is like most but not the same.
There is one US Constitution, governing the US federal government. There are 50 different state constitutions, governing 50 different states.
This topic is the subject of more than several books and encyclopedia-length articles and is far too lengthy to be addressed or handled on this venue.
If you mean "... instead of also abiding by the US Constitution", then no. The US Constitution is "the supreme law of the land", and in cases where it conflicts with state constitutions or other laws at either the federal or state level, the US Constitution "wins". There was some debate about this at one time ... the 14th amendment exists partially to clear up any doubt that state constitutions are wholly subordinate to the US constitution, and may not allow anything it forbids (they canforbid things that it tacitly allows (by not forbidding them); they can't forbid things that it explicitly states are allowed).States may (and indeed should), of course, abide by their own constitutions in all cases where there is not any explicit conflict with the US Constitution.
India's constitution has the following specialities: 1.India has the largest written constitution of the world. 2.India is the largest democracy in population. 3.India's constitution was prepared by the people's representatives elected from different parts of the country. 4.India's constitution was prepared in 2 years 11 months and 18 days as such in a short period. 5.The cost of preparing constitution was only 6.4 crore Indian rupees. 6.The maker of the constitution of India was belonging to the backward class.