many ways duhhh
No. The confederation created by Articles of Confederation was designed to have a weak central government and a strong state government.
Confedration
The republicans thought they should follow the articles of confederation and have a weak central government The federalists thought there should be a strong central government
There is no definitive answer to this question as it depends on a variety of factors, including the specific country in question and the particular type of government. However, in general, governments with a weak national government are considered to be less effective and less stable than those with a strong national government. This is because a weak national government is less able to effectively manage the country's affairs and to protect the rights and interests of its citizens. In addition, a weak national government is more likely to be overthrown by a strong, centralized government.
pete sakes
a weak- mayor system . no wear near a strong one
The Articles of Confederation had a Weak National Government. The U.S. had a Federal Sytem Government ( Or strong Government )
No. The confederation created by Articles of Confederation was designed to have a weak central government and a strong state government.
Confedration
Strong council-weak mayor.
The Articles of Confederation were weak and did not even give a semi-strong Government.
Confucianism supports a strong government; Taoism supports a weak government.
Confucianusm supports a strong government; Taoism supports a weak government
The republicans thought they should follow the articles of confederation and have a weak central government The federalists thought there should be a strong central government
no, they did not because they want to be a free tribe and if they had a government did they would be weak but they are strong
at the time of ancient Egypt the government was the strongest in the world
To build a strong government and army because the government was poor, weak, and unstable.