answersLogoWhite

0

No, I wouldn't have voted for it. The Munich Agreement, generally regarded as the shameful culmination of the Allied refusal (and inability at that time) to confront Nazi aggression. It gave Hitler what he wanted

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

FranFran
I've made my fair share of mistakes, and if I can help you avoid a few, I'd sure like to try.
Chat with Fran
RossRoss
Every question is just a happy little opportunity.
Chat with Ross
EzraEzra
Faith is not about having all the answers, but learning to ask the right questions.
Chat with Ezra

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: If you had been a member of the british house of commons in 1938 will you vote for the munich agreement?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about American Government

Which of the following pre-World War 2 situations is most similar to this scenario?

the signing of the munich agreement


What World War 2 figures signed the Munich Agreement a diplomatic effort to stop Adolf Hitler's plans for empire building in exchange for Germany's annexation of part of Czechoslovakia?

Neville Chamberlain, Edouard Daladier, Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini.


Where is the neuschwanstein castle located?

Just on German side of Austrian/German border. Bavaria. 1hour and half drive from munich


Why did appeasement happen in 1938?

Hitler's appeasement was a policy of providing concessions to Nazi Germany and its leader Adolf Hitler by European powers Britain and France mainly. The appeasement policy had many reasons. The British army was not strong enough to challenge German military which had grown tremendously during Hitler's time. A general consensus was that Treaty of Versailles was unfair and global powers were willing to make up to Germany. British leadership believed that Hitler provided a defense against Soviet communism.


Did the west buy valuable time to rearm at Munich in 1938?

The Allies, notably Great Britain, had little choice but to appease: Britain had a strong fleet but no land army that was any match for Germany's at the time. France was divided on the subject and anyway focused on defence against Germany, not on offense. The USA was firmly isolationist: public and Congress were totally against any further involvement in European wars and would remain so until well into WW 2. The other European countries were either poorly armed, keen to stay out of trouble or had Fascist regimes themselves. Britain and France were indeed buying time: France to further strengthen its defences, Britain expecting that Germany's mostly eastward annexations would finally get them into armed conflict with the USSR, which would weaken both parties.