answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The states were not united- they were still very much separate governments.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: In what way was the name US of America inaccurate under the terms set up by the articles of confederation?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about American Government

What were some reasons for the opposition to the Articles of Confederation?

The Articles of Confederation was the name given to the agreement made by the 13 original states of the United States. The main reason for opposition was that it required the states to give up any claims they had to lands further west. Some also felt that the Articles were too weak to make the United States effective, as there was nothing in the document about governance in terms of who would be president and how the judicial system would be handled.


How did the U.S. Constitution address a weakness of the Articles of Confederation?

The US Constitution created a strong central government as opposed to the state-centered Articles of Confederation. The powers of the new federal government would include taxation, printing money, establishing treaties, providing a standing military, and the regulation of interstate commerce.


What was not a major source of ideas for the Constitution?

The Magna Carta and England's unwritten constitution is a major source. The works of John Locke and other Englightenment philosophers is another. The founder's experiences in the Revolution and with the Articles of Confederation were also important. In terms of specifics, the Federalist Papers that Adams, Madison, and Jay wrote were very important.


Things dealing with consciousness expression thought and even action can be related to government terms confederation civil liberties or federalism?

civil liberties


Why did the writers of the Constitution feel it was necessary to create a new plan of government?

The Framers wrote the Constitution because they were thoroughly displeased with the system of government established by the Articles of Confederation, which as the name implies was theoretically a federation of independent states. They wanted to radically change the government and thus they did not use the Articles of Confederation as a starting point. In addition, the terms of the Constitution's ratification were different than those of the Confederation: for it to come into effect, only 9 states had to ratify for the Constitution. Since it can be argued that ultimately all the states eventually ratified the Constitution, this was apparentlly a legitimate amending of the Articles of the Confederation under the rules of the Articles. If 9-12 states approved, the Constitution would still come into effect in violation of the Articles rules forbidding any other alliance between states. One of the reasons for this is that if 9 or more states formed their own alliance, the other states would become fully independent and lose the trade and defense benefits of the Confederation, and this put additional pressure on the last ratifying states.

Related questions

Who was the hesd of state under the articles of confederation?

John Hanson was the first president to serve a one-year term under the terms of the Articles of Confederation.


Many states had problems with the terms of the Articles of Confederation and were slow to ratify the document?

They had a problem with the Constitution but not the Articles. The Articles gave them as much power as independent nations and it also was rushed.


What was the main reason the articles of confederation did not work?

The primary reason, from my perspective, that the Articles were not successful was the fact that not all of the states would agree to the wording and terms that were proposed.


Which set of terms best describes the weaknesses of the new government under the Articles of Confederation?

13 tax and trade system.


What are the weakness of the confederation?

The Articles of Confederation are important because although they were weak in terms of government power, they were America's Second Constitution. **The weaknesses are the confederation could not make an army,made all the states have only one vote, there was no president, or a national court system.** (who ever answered this question first...I asked for the weakesses...and they are above and true...ur welcome..mine are wit the stars)


What were some reasons for the opposition to the Articles of Confederation?

The Articles of Confederation was the name given to the agreement made by the 13 original states of the United States. The main reason for opposition was that it required the states to give up any claims they had to lands further west. Some also felt that the Articles were too weak to make the United States effective, as there was nothing in the document about governance in terms of who would be president and how the judicial system would be handled.


Who held the power of the Articles of Confederation?

Essentially, the state governments held most of the power under the Articles of Confederation. The founding fathers wanted to keep as far away from a monarchy like Britain's, which gave nearly all power to the central government, as possible. As a result of the terms of the Articles of Confederation, though, each state functioned almost like its own individual country instead of a component of the United States, the central government couldn't do anything about it, and the entire country faced economic issues because the central government couldn't tax its people.


After the Constitutional Convention ended what struggles still faced the nation?

The convention was the result of a campaign to reform the first charter of government of the United States, the Articles of Confederation. Throughout the 1780s, politicians who thought in national terms worried that the Confederation faced problems its government was too weak to solve.


What is the role of the state government under the articles of confederation?

Under the terms of the Articles of Confederation, each state was authorized to retain its role as a sovereign, independent entity, with every authority not specifically assigned to the national government. For taxing purposes, each state was to meet a quota determined by the value of granted or surveyed land in order to cover the costs of the war against Britain and provide for a "common defense."


What is the roles of the state government under the articles of confederation?

Under the terms of the Articles of Confederation, each state was authorized to retain its role as a sovereign, independent entity, with every authority not specifically assigned to the national government. For taxing purposes, each state was to meet a quota determined by the value of granted or surveyed land in order to cover the costs of the war against Britain and provide for a "common defense."


Who is the first president to occupy the white house?

In super-technical terms, George Washington was, but in reality he was the 8th president. The first President was actually John Hanson under the Articles of Confederation in 1781. But his presidency was downplayed because technically we were not the "United States of America" but he was still the first president because the Dec Of Ind declared us free of Britain, yet united the colonies, and so they became the United "States". But since it wasnt in writing, and because the Articles of Confederation werent such a success, people began to challenge this. And this is where we get "George Washington first president" from.


Do you often see anatomical variations that render anatomical positions and directional terms inaccurate?

no