0
What else can I help you with?
Court rule bearing on subsequent legal decisions in similar cases is called?
Stare Decisis
Guiding principle for courts that makes decisions predictable and consistent?
Stare decisis is the guiding principle for courts that makes decisions predictable and consistent.
Which means that Supreme Court decisions are respected and enforced by all other government bodies?
stare decisis
What are examples to be followed in similar cases as they arise in the lower courts or reach the US Supreme Court?
Precedents, under the doctrine of Stare decisis (Latin: Stare decisis et non quieta movere), which means "maintain what has been decided."
What are Court rulings that serve as guides for similar future cases?
The proper term for a ruling that becomes a model for future cases to follow is called "precedent." Judges will often look for those cases that have set a precedent when deciding how to rule on a present case.
What doctrine requires courts to follow authoritative prior decisions when ruling on a case?
This legal doctrine is known as stare decisis, a latin term which means to stand by decisions and not disturb the undisturbed. A prior judicial decision is commonly referred to as a precedent.
Stare Decisis is the doctrine of?
Stare decisis is a doctrine that states that courts need to abide by past controlling judicial decisions. For example, a circuit court is bound by Supreme Court holdings.
What is the doctrine that previous court decisions should apply as precedents in similar cases known as?
The doctrine that previous court decisions should apply as precedents in similar cases is known as stare decisis.
What are court decisions that become part of common law?
Precedents, under the doctrine of stare decisis(Latin: maintain what has been decided).
Which of the following best explains the principle of stare decisis, which refers to the legal doctrine of precedent where courts are generally required to follow previous decisions in similar cases?
Stare decisis is the legal principle that courts should generally follow previous decisions in similar cases. This doctrine of precedent helps ensure consistency and predictability in the legal system.
Can you explain the doctrine of stare decisis and how it influences the legal system?
Stare decisis is a legal principle that means courts should follow precedent and decisions made in previous cases. This doctrine helps ensure consistency and predictability in the legal system by promoting respect for past rulings. It influences the legal system by providing a foundation for future decisions and maintaining the stability of the law.
Disadvantages of stare decisis?
Stare decisis is the legal doctrine of deferring to the judgment of past courts. This is often called "precedent." The disadvantage is that it makes the law inflexible, and can prevent courts from correcting poor decisions. It also causes them to repeat the mistakes of past courts.
Why is the doctrine of the stare decisis important?
The requirement that a lower court must follow a previously set precedent is called stare decisis.
The concept of following previous cases or precedents is called?
The doctrine of stare decisis.
What is the doctrine of precedent that states the decisions of other courts which are not binding on a judge?
There is no doctrine of non-binding precedents. Non-binding opinions that may be used as guidelines for deciding future cases are called persuasive precedents. Binding precedents are upheld under the doctrine of stare decisis (Latin: Let the decision stand).
What is The important common law doctrine that means to stand by the decision is?
The important common law doctrine that means "to stand by the decision" is called stare decisis. This principle dictates that courts should follow precedents set by previous decisions when ruling on similar cases, ensuring consistency and predictability in the law. By adhering to established rulings, stare decisis promotes judicial efficiency and stability in legal interpretations.
What is the name for a Supreme Court decisions that will be used to decide future cases?
US Supreme Court opinions (decisions) set binding precedents because all lower courts are required to follow the same reasoning when deciding similar cases under the doctrine of stare decisis (Latin: Let the decision stand).
