I think the essential question is at the age of 52 he needs to prove how he has conducted his life as an adult. Mistakes are made by people at 15, but if they continue on the path of crime they need to face the consequences of their actions. On the other hand if the mistake at 15 is the only one and they have contributed to society and lived a good life they need to face a fine or do community service to makeup for the past. There are consequences for all of our actions in life and so it is here.
substainibilty task force and juvenile deliquency committee
What, Where, How, When, Why
they wanted to separate juveniles from adult offenders...... I feel that that answer is not entirely true the way it's worded. An Adult offender (defendant), has a Childrens Services of abuse, neglect etc.. decided in Juvenile Court before a Judge or Magistrate. For example a Jr6 hearing or disposition hearing. It is not only Juvenile offenders (ex: truancy, criminal activity under a 18 dependant on the crime and 17 dependant on the state) who are the defendents. therfore they are not seperating Juvenile from Adult offenders. I would like to hear more on this if any one will add with more knowledge
The facts of the Breed v Jones 1975 court case was about a robbery in which Breed was tried in the Los Angeles juvenile court and was charged with the original charge and two other theft or robbery. He later went for an appeal in the Supreme Court ruled that he was placed in a double jeopardy and that waiver cannot occur after jeopardy occurs. In Payton v New York, it was ruled by the Supreme Court that the police entered the homes of Mr. Payton and Mr. Riddick (defendants), without any warrant and subsequently destroyed all evidence in their homes. Reference: www.ncjrs.gov
Theamendments that were use was the 8th amendment for the death penaltyTheamendments that were use was the 8th amendment for the death penaltyTheamendments that were use was the 8th amendment for the death penalty
They will do their job which does include running checks on their defendants. And no prosecutor would let them skip it.
In Re Gault is important because it established that juveniles have the right to due process in court proceedings, including the right to legal counsel, the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses, and the privilege against self-incrimination. This landmark Supreme Court decision in 1967 provided crucial protections for juvenile defendants and significantly impacted the juvenile justice system in the United States.
Some major similarities between juvenile and adult justice systems include the administration of justice, adherence to legal procedures and protections, and the goal of ensuring public safety and accountability for crimes committed. Both systems aim to uphold principles of fairness, due process, and rehabilitation.
Yes, they have all the rights in trial court that all defendants possess.
Yes, juveniles have a constitutional right to a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. This right ensures that juvenile defendants are promptly brought to trial and prevents undue delays in the legal process.
Take the juvenile into custody.
Clearly an OPINION question that is not subject to a definite answer. The juvenile defendants will generally say NO it isn't fair. For an entirely different reason, the victims of the juveniles crimes will also say the same thing and complain about it being too lenient.
Delinquent act
Any crime committed by a juvenile or "teen"
The "big three" juvenile cases in juvenile justice are Kent v. United States, In re Gault, and In re Winship. These landmark cases established important legal rights and protections for juveniles involved in the justice system, such as the right to due process, the right to counsel, and the standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
A delinquent juvenile is a young person who has committed a crime or violated a law. They may be subject to the juvenile justice system rather than the adult criminal justice system.
Crimes committed by people who aren't considered legally adult.