0
The supreme court never reverses a decision once it has been made?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Not true. The Supreme Court has reversed many of its earlier decisions.
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoFaLsE
Anonymous
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Does the US Supreme Court have the power to issue executive orders?
No. Only the President of the United States, or the Vice-President, if the President is incapacitated, has the Constitutional authority to issue "executive orders." The President is the head of the Executive branch of government.
Was The Supreme Court on several occasions has upheld automatic expatriation?
FALSE! The Supreme Court has never upheld automatic expatration.
What happens in the case of a tie vote in the Supreme Court?
AnswerIn the event of tie votes by the Supreme Court, the lower court's ruling in the case being considered is upheld without comment. In other words, the Supreme Court issues no permanent decision on the laws involved in the case.Optionally, the Court may choose to hear reargument on the case, with the addition of the justice or justices who weren't present during the original oral arguments.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
What was The Supreme Court's 1954 Hernandez v Texas decision?
it was when Mexicans never gained rights because there Mexican.
If a county court in Illinois is deciding a case involving an issue that has never been addressed before in Illinois is the Illinois court obligated to follow Iowa Supreme court decision?
No, states are not obligated to follow other states legal decisions; however, the decisions may carry persuasive weight with the court, assuming (for example) the Iowa Supreme Court ruling doesn't violate the Illinois state constitution or statutes.If Iowa is is the only other state court system that has addressed this PARTICULAR issue then the decision of Iowa's Supreme Court can be used as "precedent" for the Illinois court to follow. If there are other states that have addressed this PARTICULAR issue and they have either agreed with, or disagreed with, the Iowa court's findings, those decisions should be also be taken into account when the Illinois court considers the issue.
True or false the supreme court never reverses a decision once it has been made?
false
What did the Supreme Court's decision in Dredd Scott originate the concept of?
It originated the concept that former slaves, or descendants of slaves, could never be citizens and therefore couldn't bring cases before the court.
Does the US Supreme Court have the power to issue executive orders?
No. Only the President of the United States, or the Vice-President, if the President is incapacitated, has the Constitutional authority to issue "executive orders." The President is the head of the Executive branch of government.
What was the major point made by the US Supreme Court regarding the Dred Scott decision?
The most significant part of the US Supreme Court's ruling on the Dred Scott case was actually two-fold. The Court by a 7-2 decision ruled that slavery was legal and that Blacks could never be US citizens because they were not white. Their race made it impossible for them to be US citizens.
Was The Supreme Court on several occasions has upheld automatic expatriation?
FALSE! The Supreme Court has never upheld automatic expatration.
Was dred Scott decision pro or antislavery?
In the 1857 US Supreme Court decision that involved the Dredd Scott case, the Court stated the slaves were property and, also, they could never be US citizens. This pro-slavery decision would later require an amendment to the US Constitution in order to abolish slavery.
What happens in the case of a tie vote in the Supreme Court?
AnswerIn the event of tie votes by the Supreme Court, the lower court's ruling in the case being considered is upheld without comment. In other words, the Supreme Court issues no permanent decision on the laws involved in the case.Optionally, the Court may choose to hear reargument on the case, with the addition of the justice or justices who weren't present during the original oral arguments.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
What US Supreme Court decision stated slaves were property and not citizens was later abolished by which constitutional amendment?
The US Supreme Court decision on the Dred Scott case affirmed that slaves were property. The court also ruled that Blacks could never be US Citizens. It took several Constitutional amendments to ensure that Blacks and other minorities had the same rights as white people. The 13th amendment abolished slavery totally.
What amendment has never been subject to a supreme court?
ninth amendment
What was The Supreme Court's 1954 Hernandez v Texas decision?
it was when Mexicans never gained rights because there Mexican.
Was the dred Scott decision proslavery?
Yep. The Dred Scott decision was all about how Dred Scott went with his slave owner up to a "free state" and stayed long enough to, technically, be free. He turned this into a court case and took it to the Supreme Court. They decided that he could never become a citizen because of his race, and could, therefore, never sue in court. The court justices thought in theory that slavery was protected by the constitution. (which it is absolutely not!) I hope this clears it up :]
Why don't the easy cases reach the supreme court?
The U.S. Supreme Court was originally created to decide the constituionality of laws. They are supposed to bring the case down to the basic question of law and then render a decision. So easy cases are never heard because the basis for decions has never been challenged because it is straight forward. The process to reach the supreme court is also lengthy. There are several appellate courts that the case has to go through to get to the phase where the supreme court can even consider it. Then they get to decide if the case deserves a review. Often times the supreme court renders decisions based on interpretation of law and that can be biased. Also social influences can have an affect on the outcome of cases. This is especially true in cases that involve terrorism. The only cases that the supreme court can render on as the first or original court are those cases involving disputes between states.
