i guess that depends on what you call wealthy.. but he was a famous man; also an author; plus a farmer; among other things.
George Washington was one of the wealthiest men in America...but not from a revenue (cash goods) standpoint but from his massive land holdings, including those "out west" (Ohio River region)
no he wasnt George Washington was a wealthy landowner
The marriage changed George from an ordinary planter to a substantially wealthy landowner. This would be a good answer speacialy if your a treca student and looking for this answer online. good luck.
He was a planter and landowner, surveyor, distiller and military officer
Yes - he was a prosperous landowner
He was a prosperous planter and landowner, a surveyor and military leader
He was a planter and landowner, surveyor and distiller, military officer
He was a planter and landowner, surveyor and distiller, and military officer
George Washington married wealthy widow Martha Dandridge Custis.
Planter and landowner; surveyor and distiller, military officer
George Washington's parents were not wealthy. His father was a slave-owning tobacco planter but was considered to have a middling rank. compared to other leading planter families.
Benjamin Franklin was already a wealthy man during the revolution. And it is said George Washington married into money. Thomas Jefferson was a wealthy landowner and slave owner, but lived beyond his means. John Adams was a thrifty New England attorney, but not wealthy by any means.
George Washington was quite wealthy. Most of his net worth was in land, real property and slaves.