Diocletian and Constantine.
it has both power and authority
Private Corporations- Have a single set of leaders that dictate the policies of the company. Hierarchical based authority. both hourly and salaried positions. With the bottom line in mind. Public bureaucracy- Hierarchical in authority to administer and manage congressional and executive needs of the president and congress. Salary based pay. Operated by non-elected officials.
policies based on racist ideas.
Oh, dude, leaders for theocracy are usually chosen based on religious criteria or appointed by religious authorities. It's like being picked for a dodgeball team, but instead of athletic ability, it's all about how devout you are. So, if you want to be a theocratic leader, better start brushing up on your prayers and hymns!
When a small group of very wealthy men control a government, it is often referred to as an "oligarchy." This form of governance is characterized by the concentration of power and influence in the hands of a few individuals or families, typically based on their wealth or social status. Oligarchies can lead to policies that favor the interests of the elite over the broader population.
the economic and social policies of both emperors were based on control and coercion,and in the long run, stifled the empire when it most needed vitality
Economic and social policies of Diocletian and Constantine were suppressive. Their policies were based on were based on the loss of individual freedom and coercion.
Network admission control and policy-based resource control are based on user identity.
The conflict perspective, rooted in the ideas of Karl Marx, would be most likely to argue that the social order is based on coercion and exploitation. This perspective focuses on the struggle for power and resources between different groups in society, with the dominant group maintaining control through coercion and exploitation of subordinate groups.
With the exception of Chile, all communist leaders have used force of arms to take control of a country.
A state run by the church is called a theocracy. In a theocracy, religious leaders hold political power and influence government policies and decisions based on religious principles.
A system of leaders who carry out the work of government is known as an "administration." This includes elected officials, appointed leaders, and civil servants who implement policies, manage public services, and oversee the day-to-day operations of government. Administrations can vary in structure and function based on the form of government in place, such as democratic, authoritarian, or parliamentary systems.
The right of choice refers to the freedom and autonomy individuals have to make decisions based on their preferences, beliefs, and values. It involves the ability to choose one's own path, make decisions without coercion, and have control over one's own life.
The statement is not false. The Enlightenment was indeed based on the idea that reason could help individuals achieve happiness, by promoting rational thinking, scientific inquiry, and individual freedoms.
Rule-based Access Control
Theocracy is a type of government where religious leaders or institutions hold political power. In a theocracy, religious laws and beliefs heavily influence and shape government policies and decision-making.
The theory of theocracy is a political system in which religious leaders control the government, and the state's legal system is based on religious law. In a theocracy, authority is often believed to be divinely ordained, with leaders acting as intermediaries between the divine and the populace. This system can manifest in various forms, ranging from complete rule by religious authorities to a government that incorporates religious principles into its laws and policies. Theocracy can be seen in historical examples such as ancient Egypt and modern-day Iran.