Virginian plan
Nicholas Gilman changed his opinion many times. He was for both.
John Dickinson was a firm supporter of "No Taxation Without Representation". He argued that there was injustice of external taxation because the British were exploiting the wealth of the colonies.
Communism called for the abolition of private property in order to equally distribute wealth and power. Communism has no social classes and gives people freedom from oppression.
Communismcommunism
it is the distribution of money and wealth
Virginia Plan
This answer is from my history book. The Virginia Plan is "a plan proposed by Edmund Randolph, a delegate to the Constitutional Convention in 1787, that proposed a government with three branches and a two house legislature in which representation would be based on a state's population or wealth."
It was a plan to give every state an equal amount of representation. New Jersey established this plan in opposition to the Virginia Plan which wanted to give states representation based on population and the wealth of the citizens. They both wanted unicameral legislatives, and the Connecticut Compromise came in and proposed to have a bicameral legislature (Senate and House of Reps).
It was a plan to give every state an equal amount of representation. New Jersey established this plan in opposition to the Virginia Plan which wanted to give states representation based on population and the wealth of the citizens. They both wanted unicameral legislatives, and the Connecticut Compromise came in and proposed to have a bicameral legislature (Senate and House of Reps).
The portion of Randolph's motion that became most controversial was called the Virgina Plan. This plan provided for a system of representation in the national legislature based on the population of each state or the proportion of each state's revenue contribution to the national government, or both. so i would say virginia...
the factor that causes a population to stop increassing is called depopulation
Small states did not like the idea of 2 houses with representation Based on the population or the wealth, on the other hand larger states did.Small states would have less representativesSmall states had less population than larger states.
Small states did not like the idea of 2 houses with representation Based on the population or the wealth, on the other hand larger states did.Small states would have less representativesSmall states had less population than larger states.
Small states did not like the idea of 2 houses with representation Based on the population or the wealth, on the other hand larger states did.Small states would have less representativesSmall states had less population than larger states.
Evercore Wealth Management's population is 76.
Nicholas Gilman changed his opinion many times. He was for both.
5% of the population control 95% of the wealth.