Arguments for a plural executive include increased accountability and transparency, as multiple officials share power and decision-making, potentially reducing the risk of corruption. It can also allow for diverse perspectives and expertise in governance. Conversely, arguments against it highlight potential inefficiencies and conflicts among executives, which can lead to disorganization and weakened leadership. Additionally, the diffusion of power may complicate accountability, making it difficult for voters to identify responsible parties for governmental actions.
why do we have plural executive
a number of independently elected executive officials
William Patterson
New Jersey Plan
They felt this was a good idea
Arguments is in the plural form for the singular noun argument.
why do we have plural executive
Secretary-treasurers is the plural of secretary-treasurer
plural executive
A plural executive is formed when there are several officials that fill the executive administrative function
The noun 'executive' is forms its plural by adding an 's' to the end on the word. The plural noun is executives.
The plural of "chief executive" is "chief executives"
the argument for and against having a single executive was that they thought a single executive could act more quickly when urgent action was required.
Arguments is a noun (plural) for verbal disagreements or altercations, oral oppositions; discussions involving different points of view; a series of reasons, facts or statements supporting a point of view. Example sentence:The debate will be arguments for and against the proposed new school policies.
Argument is a noun. The plural form is arguments.
plural executive
a number of independently elected executive officials