The Chief Justice sits in the center on the bench, or at the head of the table during conference. The other justices are seated in order of seniority.
The senior Associate Justice sits immediately to the Chief Justice's right; the second most senior sits immediately to his left. The seats alternate right to left in order of seniority, with the most junior Justice occupying the last seat.
Attempt at Diagram of Bench
Chief Justice Roberts (1)
Justice Antonin Scalia (2)............Justice Anthony Kennedy (3)
Justice Clarence Thomas (4)...........................Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (5)
Justice Stephen Breyer (6).........................................Justice Samuel Alito (7)
Justice Sonia Sotomayor (8)..............................................Justice Elena Kagan (9)
As in most situations where the US Supreme Court gathers as a group, photographs are organized around the Chief Justice in order of seniority.
The current picture on the Supreme Court Historical Society shows Chief Justice John Roberts seated front row center, flanked by Senior Associate Justice John Paul Stevens (prior to retirement) on his right, and the next most senior justice, Antonin Scalia on his left. The position of the other justices alternates left to right, by seniority as it does on the Court.
In the picture linked below, the seating order is as follows:
First Row, Seated:
Justice Kennedy, Justice Stevens, Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Scalia, Justice Thomas
Second Row, Standing:
Justice Alito, Justice Ginsburg, Justice Breyer, Justice Sotomayor
When the picture is updated, the justices will have shifted one position from where they are in the current picture.
For more information, see Related Links, below.
There are no explicit requirements in the U.S. Constitution for a person to be nominated to become a Supreme Court justice. No age, education, job experience, or citizenship rules exist. In fact, according to the Constitution, a Supreme Court justice does not need to even have a law degree.
You don't 'submit evidence' to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court only rules on cases which have already been litigated, and does not hear witnesses or view evidence.
On November 13, 1956 the US Supreme Court rules that segregated busing was nnconstitutional.
Since it is the Supreme Court that decides what is constitutional and what is not, the decisions of the Supreme Court cannot be unconstitutional, however, it is always possible for the Supreme Court to make new decisions which reverse older decisions. So in theory, if the Supreme Court does something wrong, they will be reversed by a later sitting of the same court (but with new judges).
On November 13, 1956 the US Supreme Court rules that segregated busing was nnconstitutional.
The Chief Justice is the head of the court.
There are no explicit requirements in the U.S. Constitution for a person to be nominated to become a Supreme Court justice. No age, education, job experience, or citizenship rules exist. In fact, according to the Constitution, a Supreme Court justice does not need to even have a law degree.
"Supreme Court rules against presidential executive order"
There are no explicit requirements in the U.S. Constitution for a person to be nominated to become a Supreme Court justice. No age, education, job experience, or citizenship rules exist. In fact, according to the Constitution, a Supreme Court justice does not need to even have a law degree.
"What?" indeed! If the Supreme Court rules it unconstitutional, that ends it. The only ones who can overturn that are some future Supreme Court.
Checks And Balances is what the concept is called. The chief executive appoints the supreme court justices but the upper house of the legislature must approve his choices, so no one part of government rules over the others.
Checks And Balances is what the concept is called. The chief executive appoints the supreme court justices but the upper house of the legislature must approve his choices, so no one part of government rules over the others.
Checks And Balances is what the concept is called. The chief executive appoints the supreme court justices but the upper house of the legislature must approve his choices, so no one part of government rules over the others.
Checks And Balances is what the concept is called. The chief executive appoints the supreme court justices but the upper house of the legislature must approve his choices, so no one part of government rules over the others.
Under current Senate rules, the Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court presides over any impeachment trials.
There are no formal rules of conduct specific to the Chief Justice. Article III of the Constitution, which addresses the Judicial Branch of government, states justices hold their positions during "good behavior," meaning as long as they don't commit impeachable offenses.
I believe you are asking what is the term for a Supreme Court Justice? So I will answer this question. The term of service for a Supreme Court Justice is lifetime. They cannot be voted out except by impeachment. This is what makes them so powerful and also allows them make decisions based on law and not party loyalty. There is also no set number of Justices. The first was the Honorable Justice Marshall, (that is how they are called not that they are honorable). He held office by himself. Later they added two more and so one until the 1930's when FDR in order to get the rules he wanted brought the total of Justices to nine.