I think Judicial, but I'm not sure. :)
If the US Supreme Court declares an Executive Order (Presidential action) unconstitutional, it is checking the Executive Branch.
The founding fathers separated the power to make, enforce, and interpret laws between different branches of government in order to prevent government becoming tyrannical.
No, the US Supreme Court can't enforce its decisions; this limitation is one of the checks on the power of the Judicial branch. The Court generally must rely on the Executive branch to ensure the order the Supreme Court is carried out.
Court orders are not self-executing because they are essentially just words on a piece of paper. If a person simply refuses to obey the decision or order, the judge has no ability to enforce them. It's like when a kid gets told to do something and he says "Yeah, make me." The Courts have no ability to make people obey their decisions. They need the executive branch to do the enforcing for it, because the executive branch usually controls the forces that would make the person obey the order.
The executive branch of government is an organization that is best represented with the President at the top. The executive departments and individual federal agencies would be, in that order, after the President.
The judicial branch of government can overrule the executive branch of government. The overruling of an executive order can be done in the supreme court system.
No. The court has no means to enforce that type of order.
No order to enforce
Yes, the police have the authority to enforce court orders, which are legally binding directives issued by a court. This means that they can take action to ensure that the terms of the court order are carried out.
Yes, police have the authority to enforce court orders, which are legal directives issued by a judge. This may involve arresting individuals who violate the order or carrying out other actions specified in the court order.
If the US Supreme Court declares an Executive Order (Presidential action) unconstitutional, it is checking the Executive Branch.
The founding fathers separated the power to make, enforce, and interpret laws between different branches of government in order to prevent government becoming tyrannical.
No, the US Supreme Court can't enforce its decisions; this limitation is one of the checks on the power of the Judicial branch. The Court generally must rely on the Executive branch to ensure the order the Supreme Court is carried out.
a government
a government
Only a judge can overturn a judge's decision. That said, however, the State is not obliged to follow decisions in cases to which it was not made a party. Please resubmit your question with more specificity.
Not without a court order.