The Thirteenth Amendment
The Thirteenth Amendment .
No the Congress can not nullify a ruling of the Supreme Court. The Congress would have to rewrite the law which the Supreme Court had declared unconstitutional. Then the new law could overrule the Supreme Court IF the new law was declared constitutional if/when appealed.
President or Supreme Court can find it unconstitutional.
whether or not states had the right to nullify a federal law (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ*:・゚✧
whether or not states had the right to nullify a federal law (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ*:・゚✧
Thirteenth Amendment
The Thirteenth Amendment .
Congress can overturn a Supreme Court decision by passing a new law that directly addresses the issue ruled upon by the Court. This law must be signed by the President to take effect and can effectively nullify the Court's decision.
No the Congress can not nullify a ruling of the Supreme Court. The Congress would have to rewrite the law which the Supreme Court had declared unconstitutional. Then the new law could overrule the Supreme Court IF the new law was declared constitutional if/when appealed.
The Supreme Court can nullify an Act of Congress. They would have to say that it specifically contridicted the Constitution. The President could affect a law by refusing to enforce it.
Nullification Act of 1832
States could nullify laws of Congress
to render or declare legally void or inoperative: to nullify a contract
A Supreme Court decision can be changed through a process called judicial review. This can happen through a subsequent Supreme Court decision that overturns or modifies the original ruling. Another way is through a constitutional amendment passed by Congress and ratified by the states, which can effectively nullify a Supreme Court decision. Additionally, Congress can pass legislation that clarifies or modifies the impact of a Supreme Court decision.
Short answer: Only the Constitution places restrictions on Congress. Long answer: Spending bills must originate in the house, while criminal law bills can originate in either the House or Senate. When Congress authorizes the expenditure of funds, via a spending bill, it uses a process almost identical to creating criminal law. Thus, even if it were a crime "...to use the FICA tax for anything other than what it was intended for", by Congress passing such a spending bill, it would nullify the earlier criminal law.
When I see you my love. You nullify my brain.
States could nullify federal laws. That states could and should decide when Congress was passing unconstitutional laws PLATOO against a loose interpretation of the constitution