The evidence that exists which shows that colonists had already unsuccessfully voiced their concerns to the king is the Declaration of Independence. This document was created by the Second Continental Congress in 1776 after not receive a response from England concerning many issues that arose for the colonies.
They didn't need to be, a loyalist normally was a colonist who was loyal to the British. The British were already British so they were already loyal to King George, unless there were some that weren't.
You don't 'submit evidence' to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court only rules on cases which have already been litigated, and does not hear witnesses or view evidence.
Because great Britain already wanted to take over the colonies & probobly the rest of the world next!!
When Lincoln was elected president in 1860, his views on slavery were already known and included:
Already
The evidence that exists which shows that colonists had already unsuccessfully voiced their concerns to the king is the Declaration of Independence. This document was created by the Second Continental Congress in 1776 after not receive a response from England concerning many issues that arose for the colonies.
The colonies had expressed their grievances through various petitions and resolutions, such as the Olive Branch Petition of 1775, which sought reconciliation and addressed their concerns over taxation without representation. Additionally, documents like the Declaration of Rights and Grievances in 1765 outlined specific issues and were sent to the British Parliament, highlighting colonial discontent. These efforts were largely ignored or dismissed by the crown, indicating that the colonies had attempted to voice their concerns before resorting to revolution.
Henry says that the colonists have already tried arguing.
Yes, if the evidence has already been ruled admissable in court, it can be used again. The more evidence that proves the point, the better.
They didn't need to be, a loyalist normally was a colonist who was loyal to the British. The British were already British so they were already loyal to King George, unless there were some that weren't.
Researchers are already hard at work exploring possible solutions to the infrastructure concerns.
No. At best, it would be considered "testimony" not evidence. And it would only be accepted by those who already believe it.
Surely, you can do your history homework by yourself.
You don't 'submit evidence' to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court only rules on cases which have already been litigated, and does not hear witnesses or view evidence.
The internet is already self aware. Here is the evidence. http://www.internetai.com
Because great Britain already wanted to take over the colonies & probobly the rest of the world next!!
Because Great Britain already wanted to take over the colonies & probobly the rest of the world next!!