answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Laws passed by Congress and judicial decisions are two things that have caused new interpretations of the Constitution. A changing and evolving society is another cause.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

new york state legislature passed a statute giving rights

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What has caused new interpretations of the constitution?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Who decide if new interpretations of the constitution are legal?

Supreme Court


What event prompted delegates to write a new constitution?

There was no particular event that caused the authors of the constitution to meet to create a new constitution. However, Shay's rebellion could perhaps be labeled as the most important singular event which caused the authors of the Constitution to convene.


What were sectional arguments caused by?

People who favored ratification of the new Constitution were called


What might bring new interpretations of the constitution?

According to Article V of the US Constitution.. To propose an Amendment to the Constitution one of the following must occur: 1) 2/3 of the Houlegates at ases or 2/3 of the senate also 2) de


How were the courts defined by the Constitution?

Courts have jurisdiction over interpretations of the constitution and can suggest amendments. The supreme court was the only one mentioned in the US constitution.


How did slavery encourage different interpretations of the Constitution and the nature of the union?

You doing We the People too?


What was The concept of the Constitution as a living document can best be explained as the idea that?

Interpretations change to reflect society.


What was the consequences of the shay's rebellion?

a new constitution


What are the interpretations of the constitution for the Dred S cott case?

In its judgment, the Supreme Court interpreted the Constitution to mean that slavery was legal, and that no state could vote to become free soil.


How would the US be different today if Washington had agreed with Madison and Jefferson's interpretations of the constitution?

laws would of been stricter, if Washington had listend to Madison and jeffersons interpitation of the constitution.


Is it important for all the state to ratify the constitution?

This was so that the constitution would last longer and be able to survive. If even one state had voted down the constitution, then that state may have left the nation soon after and caused problems for the new nation.


Why are judicial interpretations of the US Constitution limited in deciding issues of equality?

re-word your question. it makes no sense and I cannot understand it.