Todd Gitlin cites Alexis de Tocqueville to draw parallels between historical and contemporary societal observations, emphasizing the complexities of democracy, individualism, and social cohesion. By referencing Tocqueville, Gitlin underscores the enduring relevance of these themes in understanding modern American society and its challenges. This connection serves to highlight the cyclical nature of political and social issues, suggesting that insights from the past can inform current debates.
He may have, but if so he was quoting President Teddy Roosevelt.
No, EVERY court is required by Oath to the US Constitution (taken by the judges, US Constitution Article 6) to pass judgment upon any law contrary to the constitution that is brought before it, whether challenged or not. And failure, or refusal of that action, is a crime (Treason: violation of oath of office); quoting Marbury vs Madison (1803) "To prescribe, or to take this oath, becomes equally a crime ... if they [judges] were to be used as the instruments, and the knowing instruments, for violating what they swear to support!"
Quoting Wikipedia: "The Trail of Tears is a name given to the forced relocation and movement of Native American nations from southeastern parts of the United States following the Indian Removal Act of 1830. The removal included many members of the Cherokee, Muscogee (Creek), Seminole, Chickasaw, and Choctaw nations, among others in the United States, from their homelands to Indian Territory (eastern sections of the present-day state of Oklahoma)."
"We the people" is the subject of the sentence, and thus the authority that is ordaining and establishing. So basically, we did it. Or the we that existed then. :) This is the text of the preamble: "We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
David Walker, the abolitionist, was quoting Thomas Jefferson, who originally composed that statement for the Declaration of Independence. Obviously, if all men are created equal and are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights (including the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness) then it is morally unacceptable to enslave people and to deny them their rights. That is the philosophical basis of the abolitionist movement. Note that President Lincoln also quoted this section of the Declaration of Independence in his most famous speech, the Gettysburg Address. It is an extremely important statement and it is fundamental to America.
when your mum is quoting you should'nt annoy her
yes. th person who is quoting could be quoting someone who is quoting someone else and so on.
Here are some sentences.Did he make up that poem or is he quoting someone else?She was very good at quoting long speeches.
What is the question?! Plus why are you quoting itachi?!
No, you should copy the original format when quoting.
Once can learn more on auto trade quoting by visiting a local DMV. One may also visit some websites regarding auto trade quoting. These include AutoTrader, CarsDirect, CarBuyingStrategies, and more.
By quoting from the original correspondence that you are responding to, it shows the originator that you have read their correspondence and are responding directly to the content of their email/letter.
The difference between paraphrasing and quoting is that paraphrasing is giving a brief summary of what was said. Quoting is repeating the exact words that were said.
"______________"
A quote that comes from a primary source
Only when quoting.
Bacon Francis