The minority opinions of today might be the majority opinions of tomorrow so it's good to let your opinions be heard for the future.
people that make up majority and minorities. most polls give reliable data on opinions.
often a mixed decision with majority, dissenting, and even concurring opinions.
To show that other cases with similar circumstances came to a similar decision
The "opinion of the Court" is synonymous with the Court's decision. The Opinion gives the verdict and explains the reasoning behind the decision reached.The privilege of writing the official opinion falls to the most senior justice in the majority group, or to the Chief Justice if he voted with the majority; this person may choose to write the opinion, or may assign the task to another member of the majority.If the justices who voted against the majority wish to issue a unified dissenting opinion, they decide amongst themselves who will author the opinion, then the others, if in agreement, will "join" the opinion.Individual justices may write their own opinions, regardless of whether they agree with the majority. Justices may also "join" or sign any other written opinion they agree with. This generally strengthens the verdict.All published opinions except for Per Curiam decisions may be used as precedent in future litigation.For more information about Supreme Court opinions, see Related Links, below.
If the justices who voted against the majority wish to issue a unified dissenting opinion, they decide amongst themselves who will author the opinion, then the others, if in agreement, will "join" the opinion. Individual justices may write their own (concurring or dissenting) opinions, regardless of whether they agree with the majority. Justices may also "join" or sign any other written opinion they agree with. This generally strengthens the opinion.
people that make up majority and minorities. most polls give reliable data on opinions.
The opinions of the majority need little or no Constitutional protection because they are popular.
The vast majority of the time there is no lasting effect. In some severe cases it can cause brain damage and lead to things like cerebral palsey (a muscular problem), seizures and decreased intelligence.
why do the opinions of the majorty need little or no constitutinal protection
A lasting effect of the French colonization is that some Canadians still speak french language
In a dispute of clashing opinions, NOT in a dispute of a fact.
The Schelling effect, also known as the tipping point or threshold effect, refers to the phenomenon where individuals tend to conform to a majority decision even if it goes against their personal beliefs. This effect can lead to segregation and polarization in societies as people gravitate towards groups that share similar characteristics or opinions.
yes
tobacco.
Descending opinions, often referred to as dissenting opinions, are written by one or more judges who disagree with the majority's decision in a court case, providing their reasoning for the disagreement. Concurring opinions, on the other hand, are written by judges who agree with the majority's outcome but have different reasoning or additional points to emphasize. Both types of opinions serve to clarify legal reasoning and can influence future cases or legal interpretations.
the lasting effect of Martha Washington had was that she took care of them
The term that describes the opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court is "court opinion" or "majority opinion." This is the official statement that outlines the Court's reasoning and decision on a case. In addition to the majority opinion, there can also be concurring opinions (agreeing with the majority for different reasons) and dissenting opinions (disagreeing with the majority).