The small state benefited from that cuz.....big states did want to share their power equally ....So small states protested that to prevent this problem they established
bicameral ( tow houses )..... :) I hope this is help full for you..
The Connecticut Compromise -Apex
Roger Sherman and Olliver Ellsworth, delegates from Connecticut are the framers of the Great Compromise or the Connecticut Compromise.
Connecticut Compromise
The Great Compromise.
Connecticut CompromiseUr welcome...
small states
The smaller states benefited, because the smaller states had no use for slaves. Due to the fact that they didn't have any crops or enough property.
Slave states.
Southern States. (NovaNet)
The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, benefited both large and small states in the United States by establishing a bicameral legislature. In the Senate, each state would have equal representation, satisfying smaller states, while the House of Representatives would be based on population, addressing the concerns of larger states. This compromise helped facilitate the ratification of the U.S. Constitution by balancing the interests of diverse states and ensuring a fair representation system. Ultimately, it laid the foundation for the legislative structure of the U.S. government.
who did the commerce and slave trade compromise benefit
Connecticut Compromise
The Connecticut Compromise -Apex
Upper house A+
Roger Sherman and Olliver Ellsworth, delegates from Connecticut are the framers of the Great Compromise or the Connecticut Compromise.
without them, the small States would have carried little weight in the new government.
Connecticut Compromise