The term that describes the idea that a king's power is granted by God rather than the consent of his subjects is "Divine Right of Kings." This doctrine asserts that monarchs are accountable only to God, not to their people, legitimizing their authority and decisions as divinely ordained. This belief was prevalent in various monarchies, particularly during the Middle Ages and the early modern period.
divine right of kings-apex
Enlightenment ideas emphasized reason, individual rights, and the social contract, advocating for government as a construct that should serve the people and protect their freedoms. In contrast, most monarchs believed in the divine right of kings, asserting that their authority was granted by God and that they ruled with absolute power. This fundamental clash highlighted a shift towards democratic governance and the belief that legitimacy stems from the consent of the governed, rather than hereditary rule. Ultimately, Enlightenment thinkers challenged the notion of unchecked monarchical power, laying the groundwork for modern democratic ideals.
freedom!!!! when the government does it it is called a pardon.Answer:Freedom is not granted but rather taken. Too many times it is taken for granted but freedom granted is nothing more than an oxymoron. While pardons and even paroles may seem like freedom granted, it is more correct to view it as freedom acknowledged. Surely a man convicted who has either been pardoned or paroled has paid whatever price that would have or did take his freedom away to begin with but just because it was taken from him does not mean upon this mans newfound freedom it was granted by anyone other than his own being who will either enjoy that freedom or not. In medieval times there were legal documents that would "grant freedom" to serfs or even owners of shipwrecked salvage but this was a primitive time where people were willing to believe freedom was up to somebody else to grant and not simply there for the taking. Perhaps there are many now who believe the same but there are just as many who live their lives free with or without the permission of the "powers that be".
The Mayflower Compact begins with the phrase "We, whose names are underwritten," which emphasizes the collective agreement of the signers. The document states that they are creating a "civil body politic" for their better ordering and preservation, highlighting the idea of governance established by the consent of the governed. This reflects a foundational belief in self-government, as the settlers committed to making laws and decisions through mutual consent rather than being imposed by external authority.
The American Declaration of Independence not only suggests a particular relationship between government and governed; it out rightly declares what that relationship is or, rather, should be. Fundamentally, the relationship is consensual; that is, government rules over the governed only by the consent of those who are governed.
divine right of kings-apex
divine right of kings-apex
divine right of kings-apex
A tyrant rules by force and not by consent or legitimacy. They often impose their will on others through oppression and fear rather than honoring the rights and well-being of their subjects.
should informed consent be a process rather than a one time event
The Jewish faith
== ==
Abstraction in modern art involves the simplification or distortion of visual elements to emphasize the underlying essence or idea rather than representing them realistically. It focuses on expressing emotions, concepts, or interpretations through the use of color, form, and composition rather than depicting recognizable subjects.
True, informed consent should be a process rather than a one-time event, since there are likely to be more than one aspect of a medical treatment about which a patient will need to be informed, and which will require consent.
In 1945 - rather later than in many countries.
No. Rather you have a child or not, until you're 18 you need parental consent.
Humanism