an autocratic one.with autocratic governments power is concentrated in few top-brass leaders.citizen's participation is through electing officials but in autocracies elections may not be existent or do not truly represent the aspirations of the citizens.
governments could be in republican or monarchical settings.citizen's participation is confined and limited to irrelevant matters that do not matter most.autocratic states can be ideologically left or right yet very little distinguish one system from another leaders primarily resort to brute force to win loyalty and the is wholesale controls in citizens personal freedoms governments tend to emerge and collapse out of revolutions thus are associated with human right abuses.
It demonstrated the the US federal government was determined not to allow segregation laws to infringe on the civil rights of African-Americans.
Well NAFTA allows many things as in government and central government.
A government that does not allow normal citizens to participate - APEX
the judicial review allow the government to adapt to the changes in the us by with higher authority such as the terms of the written constitution and the treaty
Great Britain did not allow the colonists to participate in government.
citizen participation and self-governance
citizen participation and self-governance
The government of the Philippines does not allow you to have dual nationality.
Communism is a dictatorship and doesn’t allow for citizens participation in the government nor provide human rights.
The British government allows dual citizenship. However, the government of the other country might not allow this thus force you to renounce British citizenship if you want to become a citizen of their country.
itlog
They can get married in a court and the court can allow the Polish citizen free citizen ship
No, if you do everything legally, (make sure you document everything properly with ICE and find out how to go about the process legally) you'll have papers that allow you to travel with relatively little inconvenience.
they allow peaceful change through the mass participation of citizens
Yes
Hamilton's proposal that found little support in the Constitutional Convention was that he wanted a national government. He believed that a national government would centralize power, but allow states to retain their individuality.
I highly, highly doubt it. In fact, almost sure that you could become a citizen. If they did not allow you to become a citizen, I believe that would be discrimination of some sort...