Daniel Webster, a prominent American statesman, held a complex view on slavery. He believed in preserving the Union and often took a pragmatic approach, supporting the Compromise of 1850, which included a stronger Fugitive Slave Law. While he personally opposed the expansion of slavery into new territories, he prioritized national unity over moral opposition to slavery, reflecting the tensions of his time. Ultimately, his stance drew criticism from both abolitionists and pro-slavery advocates.
One example of someone who was not an advocate for the abolition of slavery was John C. Calhoun. Calhoun was a prominent southern politician who vehemently defended slavery and argued for its preservation. He believed that slavery was a positive good and essential for the southern economy and way of life.
John C. Calhoun
No way no how he was a southern plantation owner that was pro slavery till the very end. A bitter old racist.
Daniel Webster, a prominent American statesman, had a complex view on slavery. While he personally opposed the expansion of slavery into new territories, he believed in preserving the Union and often compromised on the issue to maintain national unity. In his famous speech supporting the Compromise of 1850, he argued that preserving the Union was essential, even if it meant accepting the continuation of slavery in some contexts. Ultimately, his stance reflected a pragmatic approach rather than a strong moral opposition to the institution itself.
John C. Calhoun viewed slavery as a good thing. He thought that if tasks were to be accomplished using slaves, then so be it. His view was his thinking about the cotton industry. Calhoun was also concerned about having too many slaves in the deep south. They were too large a population in comparison to whites. Calhoun believed that bringing Texas into the Union as a slave state, would allow slavery to be spread over a wider area.
Daniel Calhoun has written: 'Professional lives in America'
Calhoun believed that the federal government did not have the power to ban slavery, while Webster believed the government did have this power.
John C. Calhoun and Daniel Webster were senators in the 1800s who represented South Carolina and Massachusetts, respectively. Around this time was the civil war and slavery. Calhoun believed in expansionism, and was pro-slavery in the interest of southern economics, wanting power in the state to be strongest. Webster focused on northern interests, and saw value in the federal government's power growing.
Calhoun resolution was important in that it opposed slavery.
John C. Calhounjohn c calhoun...the ones that wanted slavery
He was one of the greatest United States Senators in history serving in the 19th century with other legislative legends such as Henry Clay, Daniel Webster and Stephen Douglas. Calhoun was a pro-slavery South Carolinian who was at the center of both the Nullification Crisis of 1833 and the Compromise of 1850.
The difference was more generational than leadership-oriented, plus the slavery-anti-slavery issue was involved. Henry Clay, Daniel Webster, and John C. Calhoun were the leading figures of the generation preceding the Civil War, with Clay and Calhoun pro-slavery and Webster against. William Seward and Stephan Douglas (who both lost the presidential primary to Abraham Lincoln), were instrumental in Lincoln's cabinet in winning the Civil War.
it was Daniel Webster.
One example of someone who was not an advocate for the abolition of slavery was John C. Calhoun. Calhoun was a prominent southern politician who vehemently defended slavery and argued for its preservation. He believed that slavery was a positive good and essential for the southern economy and way of life.
They were arguing about the slavery and tariffs of the country. Webster opposed tariffs at first, but then came to like them for the industry
he lives in north caroline and knew slavers .