0
What was John Calhoun's argument that supported the removal of Indians from their land?
John C. Calhoun argued that the removal of Native Americans from their ancestral lands was necessary for the expansion and development of the United States. He believed that the presence of Native tribes hindered economic progress and the growth of American civilization, viewing their removal as a means to promote agriculture and settlement. Calhoun also framed the issue in terms of racial superiority, asserting that white Americans were destined to dominate the continent. His perspective reflected a broader ethos of Manifest Destiny, which justified westward expansion at the expense of Indigenous peoples.
What else can I help you with?
Why did many Americans support the Indian removal act of 1830?
Many Americans supported Indian removal because they thought it would be good for them because they did not think the U.S would expand past the Mississippi River. Some thought that now the Indians could govern themselves and not be harassed.
Who was the first president of the US that wanted the removal of the Indians?
lincoln
The Indian removal act called for the govtto negotiate treaties that would require native Americans to?
the Indians east of the Mississippi had to move into the western states
What was the rationale then and now for the Indian removal act?
This was known as No more Indians in North America. This was because the settlers didn't like their ways, and thought they were aggressive.
What was Samuel Worcester perceive as the cause of request for the removal?
Samuel Worcester perceived the request for his removal as a direct response to his efforts to advocate for Native American rights and sovereignty, particularly in relation to the Cherokee Nation. He believed that his stance against the encroachment of state laws on Native American lands was viewed as a threat by those who supported the removal policies. Worcester's commitment to defending the Cherokee's legal claims and cultural identity put him at odds with the prevailing attitudes of the time, leading to his dismissal. Ultimately, his removal reflected broader tensions between federal authority, state interests, and Native American rights.
Who supported Indian removal act?
yes people were against this act because you cool
Who supported the removal act?
Andrew Jackson
Was the removal of the Indian tribes supported by people of the US?
It depends. Some tribes were supported.
Why did many Americans support the Indian removal act of 1830?
Many Americans supported Indian removal because they thought it would be good for them because they did not think the U.S would expand past the Mississippi River. Some thought that now the Indians could govern themselves and not be harassed.
What happened to the Mandan Indians?
The Mandan Indians had to move from their home in the Indian Removal Act
What is an important event that happened in 1830?
it was the removal of the Indians
Who were the Florida Indians who refused to accept removal?
The Seminoles.
To what territory were Indians relocated by the Removal Act?
Oklahoma
Who Supported the the Indian removal act?
Andrew Jackson
How does the phrase happy consummation (which is another way to say a happy conclusion) help contribute to a tone of satisfaction in this excerpt?
It makes the actions seem good and supported by all.
How does Jackson most cearly use a hasty generalization about Indian removal in this excerpt?
He concludes that american Indians hold the same views as whites about settling in a new land.
What is removal and resettlement?
Removal and Resettlement is, well Removal is like relocation just like the Indian Removal Act of 1830, land greed was getting out of control with the Indians so they were forced to relocate by the government. Resettlement is also like relocation, the Indians found a new location to settle into.
