0
What was the Northeren states argument for slaves NOT counting towards population?
The Northern states argued that slaves should not count towards the population for representation purposes because they viewed enslaved individuals as property rather than citizens with rights. They believed that including slaves in the population count would unfairly inflate the political power of Southern states, which relied on slavery. This stance was part of the larger debate during the Constitutional Convention, which ultimately led to the Three-Fifths Compromise, allowing each slave to be counted as three-fifths of a person for representation and taxation purposes.
What else can I help you with?
What is a federal ratio?
The federal ratio is simply another name for the three-fifths compromise set forth by congress to deal with the issue of counting slaves towards population in regards to representation in the house of representatives. It basically says that one slave will count for 3/5 of a free man when counting population for seats by state in the house. This compromise went on to affect Thomas Jefferson's election to president and other events in that the southern slave owners were given votes in compliance with the three-fifths compromise, thus giving his supporters extra votes to give him, meanwhile the northern states did not have the slaves to do this with for various reasons.
The irregular American troops who played a crucial role in swaying the neutral civilian population towards the patriots cause?
Militia or militia men
What was the 3 to 5 ratio for counting slaves?
It was a result of a compromise between the North and the South. The North wanted slaves to be counted for taxation purposes in the South to bring in more revenue for the federal government which was something the South did not want. But the South wanted to count slaves towards in population in terms of representation so they could have more members in the House of Representative which the North did not want. In the end they settled upon the idea that each slave counted as 3/5 of a person, both in terms of taxation and representation.
Did wilsons 14 point peace plan harm the US?
No, it did not. In fact in 1928 his League of Nations help ratify 65 countries and they agreed that they would not use war a means to win a argument. his 14 point plan helped the world abolish slavery. I contributed towards free trade and no economic barriers. If I were you i would look at what you would define as harming the U.S. I personally think it did the WORLD more good than harm.
Who was Thomas Paine's list of grievances directed towards?
Thomas Paine's list of grievances were directed towards England. The name of these grievances were called Thomas Paine's Common Sense.
How did delegates settle the problem of slaves counting towards a states population?
3/5 Compromise
What does design argument mean?
The design argument, also known as the teleological argument, is an argument for the existence of God based on the idea that the complexity and order in the natural world indicate the existence of a designer. It suggests that the intricate design and purposeful arrangement of the universe point towards an intelligent creator.
Why is the moral argument called the moral argument?
The moral argument is called that because it is an argument for the existence of God based on the existence of objective moral values and duties. It suggests that the existence of moral values points towards the existence of a moral lawgiver, which is typically identified as God.
How do teenage guys act towards an argument?
VERY AGGRESSIVELY! Blame it on immaturity and too much testosterone.
Where is the number 2 cylinder on a 5.4l Triton?
Passanger side, 2nd cylinder towards the firewall, counting from the front.
How do you get along with your brother?
Not to start an argument with him, if he asks you a question don't be sarcastic towards him, if he's nasty to you don't retaliate.
What is acrimonious?
Acrimonious refers to a very hostile attitude or argument.
Is the argument from morality for the existence of god a strong argument?
The argument from morality posits that moral values point towards the existence of a higher being that establishes objective moral truths. While this argument persuades some individuals, others argue that morality can be explained through evolutionary processes or societal constructs, making it a debated topic among philosophers and theologians. Ultimately, the strength of this argument depends on one's perspective and beliefs.
What does the teleological argument state?
The teleological argument states that the complexity and order in the universe imply the existence of a designer or higher intelligence. It suggests that the intricate design and purposeful arrangement of the universe's components point towards a creator rather than occurring by chance. This argument is often used to support the existence of a God or intelligent designer.
What does counting up mean?
Counting up refers to the process of sequentially increasing a number or quantity, typically starting from a lower value and moving towards a higher one. This can be done in increments of one or larger intervals, depending on the context. It's often used in various settings, such as teaching basic arithmetic, tracking scores, or measuring time. The opposite of counting up is counting down, which involves decreasing a number.
What is the main idea of the swift argument?
The main idea of the Swift argument is to highlight the unjust treatment of the poor in Ireland by suggesting that selling their children as food to the rich can help alleviate poverty and overpopulation issues, while also critiquing the British government's negligence towards Ireland's economic problems. Ultimately, Swift uses satire to criticize the oppressive policies imposed on the Irish population by both their local ruling classes and the British government.
Enmity used in a sentence?
After the argument, John felt nothing but enmity towards his former friend. "Enmity" means a really deep feeling of dislike.
