Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
The federal ratio is simply another name for the three-fifths compromise set forth by congress to deal with the issue of counting slaves towards population in regards to representation in the house of representatives. It basically says that one slave will count for 3/5 of a free man when counting population for seats by state in the house. This compromise went on to affect Thomas Jefferson's election to president and other events in that the southern slave owners were given votes in compliance with the three-fifths compromise, thus giving his supporters extra votes to give him, meanwhile the northern states did not have the slaves to do this with for various reasons.
Militia or militia men
It was a result of a compromise between the North and the South. The North wanted slaves to be counted for taxation purposes in the South to bring in more revenue for the federal government which was something the South did not want. But the South wanted to count slaves towards in population in terms of representation so they could have more members in the House of Representative which the North did not want. In the end they settled upon the idea that each slave counted as 3/5 of a person, both in terms of taxation and representation.
No, it did not. In fact in 1928 his League of Nations help ratify 65 countries and they agreed that they would not use war a means to win a argument. his 14 point plan helped the world abolish slavery. I contributed towards free trade and no economic barriers. If I were you i would look at what you would define as harming the U.S. I personally think it did the WORLD more good than harm.
The quality of the soil in the east was becoming infertile due to excessive farming, so a push towards the western frontier was needed for the growing population. The Native Americans there had to be pushed out because the settlers were too numerous to share with.
3/5 Compromise
The design argument, also known as the teleological argument, is an argument for the existence of God based on the idea that the complexity and order in the natural world indicate the existence of a designer. It suggests that the intricate design and purposeful arrangement of the universe point towards an intelligent creator.
The moral argument is called that because it is an argument for the existence of God based on the existence of objective moral values and duties. It suggests that the existence of moral values points towards the existence of a moral lawgiver, which is typically identified as God.
VERY AGGRESSIVELY! Blame it on immaturity and too much testosterone.
Passanger side, 2nd cylinder towards the firewall, counting from the front.
Not to start an argument with him, if he asks you a question don't be sarcastic towards him, if he's nasty to you don't retaliate.
Acrimonious refers to a very hostile attitude or argument.
The argument from morality posits that moral values point towards the existence of a higher being that establishes objective moral truths. While this argument persuades some individuals, others argue that morality can be explained through evolutionary processes or societal constructs, making it a debated topic among philosophers and theologians. Ultimately, the strength of this argument depends on one's perspective and beliefs.
The teleological argument states that the complexity and order in the universe imply the existence of a designer or higher intelligence. It suggests that the intricate design and purposeful arrangement of the universe's components point towards a creator rather than occurring by chance. This argument is often used to support the existence of a God or intelligent designer.
The main idea of the Swift argument is to highlight the unjust treatment of the poor in Ireland by suggesting that selling their children as food to the rich can help alleviate poverty and overpopulation issues, while also critiquing the British government's negligence towards Ireland's economic problems. Ultimately, Swift uses satire to criticize the oppressive policies imposed on the Irish population by both their local ruling classes and the British government.
After the argument, John felt nothing but enmity towards his former friend. "Enmity" means a really deep feeling of dislike.
To start a body paragraph for achieving your goal, begin by stating a specific point or argument related to the goal you are working towards. This can provide a clear focus for the rest of the paragraph and guide your discussion towards addressing the steps or strategies needed to achieve your goal. Make sure to support your point with relevant evidence or examples to strengthen your argument.