The strict constructionists wants to follow the Constitution down to the letter, in accordance with what the founding meant the terms to mean. The loose constructionists want to incorporate changes to society into the interpretation of the Constitution.
John Marshall is considered to have been a loose constructionist, rather than a strict constructionist. Marshall was the 4th Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
Alexander Hamilton (His idea of a National Bank was based of the fact that the constitution didn't explicitly prohibit it and therefore, it was constitutional.
A loose constructionist view of the U.S. Constitution is one factor that has led to the national government expanding its power. The opposite philosophy is known as strict constructionism.
The national bank is often considered an example of a loose interpretation of the Constitution because its establishment was not explicitly outlined in the document. Proponents, like Alexander Hamilton, argued that the Necessary and Proper Clause allowed Congress to create institutions that support its enumerated powers, such as regulating currency and managing federal finances. This flexible approach contrasts with a strict constructionist view, which would limit the federal government to only those powers explicitly stated in the Constitution. Thus, the national bank exemplifies a broader interpretation of federal authority.
Strict constructionists and loose constructionists primarily disagree on the interpretation of the U.S. Constitution. Strict constructionists advocate for a narrow, literal interpretation, arguing that the Constitution should be understood based solely on its text as it was originally written. In contrast, loose constructionists believe in a more flexible interpretation that allows for adapting the Constitution to modern circumstances and societal changes. This fundamental difference influences debates on issues such as federal power, individual rights, and the scope of government authority.
Thomas Jefferson was a strict constructionist. Hamilton was a loose constructionist.
He was a strict constructionist. He viewed interpretted the Constituion narrowly. Strict constructionist were also called antiFederalists.
Thomas Jefferson was a strict constructionist president, but during his presidency he made many loose constructionist decisions. (during his 1st term)
Thomas Jefferson was a strict constructionist president, but during his presidency he made many loose constructionist decisions. (during his 1st term)
John Adams was generally considered to be a strict constructionist, meaning he believed in a strict interpretation of the constitution. However, there were some instances where he deviated from this view, such as when he signed the Alien and Sedition Acts, which many argued were unconstitutional. So, while Adams leaned towards strict constructionism, his actions were not always consistent with this perspective.
John Marshall is considered to have been a loose constructionist, rather than a strict constructionist. Marshall was the 4th Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
They were strict constructionist which means they took the constitution literally word for word. While others took the constitution loosely and were known as loose constructionists.
They were strict constructionist which means they took the constitution literally word for word. While others took the constitution loosely and were known as loose constructionists.
Monroe believed that the US needed a strong central government that had power. He believed that most of the powers were implied in the Constitution, though, not specifically spelled out, because 1) if the Founders did that they were bound to forget something and 2) he wanted the goals of the Constitution to be able to be flexible to changing standards and the evolution of the US. Therefore, he technically could be considered both a loose and strict constructionist, but most consider him to be a loose constructionist because he was in favor of a powerful executive.
In a loose view, constitutionalist perspective means that you have the right to challenge the government. With a loose view, you feel that laws have been passed to prevent wars between the states.
Sandra Day O'Connor
because he was for manufacturing and not for farming. Jefferson was a strict constructionist and he was for farming. hamilton was a loose constructionist also because he thought that elastic clause is not looking for a strict govt. Jefferson wanted a srtict govt. and did what the constitution said exactly how it is said....that is all. :) no lies... no junk.... real constitution stuff.