Proponents of the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II argued that it was a necessary measure for national security, fearing that individuals of Japanese descent could act as spies or saboteurs for Japan. They believed that the internment would prevent potential espionage and ensure the safety of the West Coast. Additionally, some asserted that it was a wartime necessity, reflecting a broader climate of fear and prejudice against Japanese Americans. These arguments were fueled by racial stereotypes and a lack of trust in the loyalty of Japanese Americans.
I do no know this answer because i do not care
They wanted it to made because it was important for the government to be nationalized.
Federalist
No, John Langdon was against a Bill of Rights. He believed everyone had been debating long enough, and it was time for action. He argued that the Constituion was clear already, but his arguments failed.
That depends on whether you're talking about civil rights or labor law. The US Supreme Court interpreted the constitution to favor whites over African-Americans, and Industryover labor.
They rhought that japanse was bad person
saratoga? Energy is what caused the tide to turn in favor of the Americans. This is taught in History.
adopting the constitution
I do no know this answer because i do not care
chucky schumer, nancy pelosi
The key to all arguments is having logical information and facts. This will make it easier to present your case in opposition or in favor of the argument.
that a virgin couldn't get pregnant, because she was a virgin
Pros could be professionals, or they could be arguments in favor of something (as opposed to cons).
morale and propaganda.
unions were buttholes
Admiral Mahan's arguments were that our growing production needs this, we need ways to respond quickly, and that we need to be closer. :)
The right to use pornography.