They were very upset that the colonists did not appreciate their generosity. It was only passed to defend the colonial borders and it was not used for the British benefit. Many people wrongly believe that it was used for their own benefit. If you are doing this for a school project, this is the correct answer.
American importers were not paying the excessively high duty that had been placed on Sugar (molasses) by the Molasses Act of 1733. They found it cheaper to pay bribes of a penny or so per gallon, to the customs collectors. When George Grenville became Prime Minister, he had Parliament overhaul the old act with a new Sugar Act, 1764. The new act lowered the tax on sugar entering the colonies, but it also created a new system for enforcing the act, making sure that the lowered duties would be collected. In New England, where molasses was a major trade item used in making various drinks as well as a sweetener, there was immediate concern. A Boston town meeting declared that the city would boycott (not purchase) all British imports to that colony. Other New England cities, including New York, followed Boston’s lead. American Colonists granted Parliament the right to regulate trade but the colonists declared that the Sugar Act was an attempt to raise money in the colonies, something that colonists believed only colonial legislatures could do. They pointed to the official title of the Sugar Act--The American Revenue Act of 1764. Hence, the Americans, for perhaps the first time, raised the cry that they could not be taxed by a political body that did not represent them. They elected representatives to their assemblies, but not to Parliament. The cry, “No taxation without representation” would become a rallying cry for those favoring independence. In 1766, the British government reduced the duty on sugar to one penny (what had been the “traditional” bribe), and protest in New England began to subside.
The reaction to the sugar act was when the colonist protested against taxation
The Sugar Act was passed to protect trade routes. It made trading more expensive, and it led to American settlers refusing to buy British goods.
The colonists started to punch king George.
After. The stamp act was added in 1765 and the sugar act was improved in 1764.
In 1766 Great Britain repealed the Sugar Act and replaced it with the Revenue Act of 1766.
The colonial reaction to the sugar act was smuggling sugar and molasses.
Well, for one, the stamp act taxed STAMPS and other commonalities, while the sugar act taxed SUGAR and other commonalities.
sugar act! u need 2 keep up wit history people
There reactions were mild and with no violence.
concern and mad i think
The colonists were furious. they protested, the sons of liberty rioted. the sugar act was meant to crack down on smugglers of foreign goods.
The Sugar Act
sugar act
the sugar act came first
The Sugar Act of 1934 regulated sugar imports
The Sugar Act was a tax put on sugar by King George.
Sugar act
After. The stamp act was added in 1765 and the sugar act was improved in 1764.
The Sugar Act went in to effect in 1764.
The sugar act supposedly started in 1764.