Roger Taney was the fifth Chief Justice of the United States, best known for his role in the Dred Scott v. Sandford decision, which denied citizenship to African Americans and upheld the legality of slavery in the territories. His rulings reflected a commitment to states' rights and a conservative interpretation of the Constitution, which ultimately exacerbated sectional tensions leading up to the Civil War. Taney's legacy is often viewed negatively, as his decisions are seen as reinforcing racial discrimination and hindering civil rights progress.
If you spelled his last name correctly (it's Taney), you would probably have more luck looking him up.He was the fifth Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court. With that and the proper spelling, you should be able to find enough information to complete the rest of your homework yourself.
You need to do this question.We don't do homework and your teacher is looking for your critical thinking skills and how well you understood the lesson.
A student enrolls in a drivers education class
It gave too much power to the legislative branch.
I would not agree with this statement. There are many powers and actions that, while not expressly prohibited, are also not permitted or acceptable. For instance, while a person is not expressly prohibited from driving while taking a prescription for opiate pain medications, that person is not permitted to drive freely unless they are sober.
That would be Roger B. Taney.
Ask him why he started as an Abolitionist and ended as an extreme pro-slavery bigot.
Taney was the Chief Justice who declared that slavery was legal in every state of the Union - greatly deepening the divide between the two sections. He said he was interpreting the Constitution in the way that the Founding Fathers would have meant. So when they decreed that a man's property was sacred, they would have included slaves within their definition of property. Ironically, Taney had been an Abolitionist as a young man. But he was very old by the time of this court-case.
Taney was the Chief Justice who declared that slavery was legal in every state of the Union - greatly deepening the divide between the two sections. He said he was interpreting the Constitution in the way that the Founding Fathers would have meant. So when they decreed that a man's property was sacred, they would have included slaves within their definition of property. Ironically, Taney had been an Abolitionist as a young man. But he was very old by the time of this court-case.
Taney was the Chief Justice who declared that slavery was legal in every state of the Union - greatly deepening the divide between the two sections. He said he was interpreting the Constitution in the way that the Founding Fathers would have meant. So when they decreed that a man's property was sacred, they would have included slaves within their definition of property. Ironically, Taney had been an Abolitionist as a young man. But he was very old by the time of this court-case.
the US and SU would govern the Korean peninsula
Lincoln would use military force only when necessary.
yes because walters grandmothers daughter is walters mother, and if Walter has a son, then his mother is her grandmother, so its true
He was the elderly Chief Justice, who gave the Supreme Court ruling that denied freedom to the slave Dred Scott in 1857. His judgment that slavery was legal in every state of the Union, according to the Constitution, inflamed Northern Abolitionists, and deepened the division between the two sections. Ironically, Taney had been an Abolitionist himself as a young man.
They didn't particularly. It was the Supreme Court, influenced by the elderly Chief Justice, Roger Taney, that interpreted the Constitution in this way. Taney reckoned that when the Founding Fathers had declared that a man's property was sacred, they would have included slaves in their definition of property. So was the South that applauded this decision - strictly, it meant that slavery was legal in every state of the Union.
If you spelled his last name correctly (it's Taney), you would probably have more luck looking him up.He was the fifth Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court. With that and the proper spelling, you should be able to find enough information to complete the rest of your homework yourself.
Chief Justice Roger B. Taney delivered the majority opinion in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case in 1857, stating that Congress could not ban slavery in the territories as it would violate the Fifth Amendment.