This is very hard to accomplish, as every member of each branch would need to agree to override their given authority. If this were accomplished however, then the three branches would have to forfeit their powers to Chuck Norris.
There would be abuse of power and corruption at all levels. The three branches of government have been designed and created to keep the "check and balances" system in place, exactly to prevent abuse and corruption from happening.
Because they had only gathered to amend the Articles of the Confederation. They did not gather to write a whole new Constitution.
The term "limited government" may not be found in the Constitution, but the concept of limited government is established in the Constitution by means of the definitions of the powers of the branches of the Government. Each branch has specified responsibilities and powers, and may not exceed those responsibilities and powers under the terms of the Constitution. In other words, the Constitution says what the Government should do, and that's all it can do. That's limited government. The Preamble of the Constitution explicitly gives the power of our government to "We the People". The fifth article gives "We the People" the right to amend the Constitution,ergo the government is not limited except by the will of the majority governed.The term "limited government"is illogical and not implied.
Judges are not ignoring laws and introducing their own biases. This process inadvertently allows judges to exceed their authority in the court of law.
exceed local need
There would be abuse of power and corruption at all levels. The three branches of government have been designed and created to keep the "check and balances" system in place, exactly to prevent abuse and corruption from happening.
Because they had only gathered to amend the Articles of the Confederation. They did not gather to write a whole new Constitution.
Federal Courts can nullify Presidential directives if they are unconstitutional. Congress can remove a President if he fails to support the Constitution.
No, police officers do not have the authority to exceed the speed limit without a valid reason.
supreme court
supreme court
no, never ever ever
i am pretty sure he isn't able to unless the congress changes the constitution to suit the presidents needs
If the value of the assets greatly exceed the allowable exemptions, then yes they can be seized.
I doubt it very much. There, of course, are Naval guns and artillery pices that can greatly exceed this distance.
The term "limited government" may not be found in the Constitution, but the concept of limited government is established in the Constitution by means of the definitions of the powers of the branches of the Government. Each branch has specified responsibilities and powers, and may not exceed those responsibilities and powers under the terms of the Constitution. In other words, the Constitution says what the Government should do, and that's all it can do. That's limited government. The Preamble of the Constitution explicitly gives the power of our government to "We the People". The fifth article gives "We the People" the right to amend the Constitution,ergo the government is not limited except by the will of the majority governed.The term "limited government"is illogical and not implied.
Judges are not ignoring laws and introducing their own biases. This process inadvertently allows judges to exceed their authority in the court of law.