0
Which of acts could indicate that a government had lost legitimacy with the people?
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Government in which people elect delegates to make laws is?
A government in which people elect delegates to make laws is a Representative Government. A Democracy could be representative or direct.
Would people in an unlimited government speak out against the government?
No, because they could be punished really bad by the unlimited government.
How can people participate at the provincial government level?
people could participate by:Run for the NDP
Disadvantages about plutocracy?
Since Plutocracy is a government ran by the wealthy, there could be a few disadvantages but also there could be some advantages, also. Disadvantages: Wealthy People running a government can be a bad idea. They could make people pay more money for taxes, and they could make people pay more for cars and anything in stores. Advantages: Wealthy people running a government could also be a good idea. Knowing that wealthy people can cherish their money and not want to give it away, they could higher people to make money for them so that there will be less taxes and more money towards employed people.
What would it be like in America if the government could not make people obey the laws?
Life in America would be very chaotic if the government could not make people obey the laws. Since people would not obey people of authority, they would do whatever they wanted and there would be no order anywhere.
What acts could indicate that a government had lost legitimacy with the people?
all of the above
What is the age of colt 45 government model serial W40667?
My research indicates that your colt government model was made for the U.S. navy in 1913.Does there indicate any government property markings on the frame? If you could indicate what is written on the slide I may be better able to identify your colt.
What type of Romans could serve in a government?
rich people could serve
Shays rebellion made people think what?
that the government could not protect the people.
How can people participate at the provincial government?
people could participate by:Run for the NDP
What English philosopher who called for consent of the governed?
John Locke is the English philosopher who is known for advocating for the consent of the governed as the foundation for legitimate government. In his writings, particularly in his Two Treatises of Government, Locke argued that individuals have the right to consent to their rulers and that government's legitimacy is derived from the consent of the governed.
Government in which people elect delegates to make laws is?
A government in which people elect delegates to make laws is a Representative Government. A Democracy could be representative or direct.
Would people in an unlimited government speak out against the government?
No, because they could be punished really bad by the unlimited government.
How can people participate at the provincial government level?
people could participate by:Run for the NDP
Who was the early European sociologist who addressed power and how it is perceived as legitimate or illegitimate by the people?
Max Weber, a German sociologist, addressed the concept of power and legitimacy in his work. He argued that authority could be legitimate through traditional, charismatic, or legal-rational forms, and that the perception of legitimacy was crucial for maintaining social order in a society.
What was the system of government at Jamestown?
it was a represenitive government
When would the government be allowed to limit what people say?
The government would be allowed to limit what people say when it actively hurts another group of people For example, the government could limit speech that incites rioting.
