A seventeenth-century European king would most likely support the theory of absolute monarchy, which posits that a monarch holds supreme authority and is not bound by laws or regulations imposed by a governing body. This theory, championed by thinkers like Thomas Hobbes, justified the king's divine right to rule, asserting that the monarchy's power was ordained by God. Such a belief reinforced the king's control over both his subjects and the state, aligning with the period's political landscape.
the urban poor
Which of these would a socially conservative politician MOST LIKELY support?
Less Likely To Participate in Community Activities
Farmers and settlers were likely to support the War of 1812 because they wanted the freeland that was promised and the farmers' right for trading was at stake so they agreed to the war.
adopting antitrust laws
Brazil
A 17th century European king would most likely support the divine right theory.
A 17th century European king would most likely support the divine right theory.
the devine right theory
The divine right theory
Some choices would be nice for a "which" question, but in terms of political theories, most European Kings in the 1600s were absolutist and believed in the divine right of the monarchy, so ABSOLUTE MONARCHY or any derivative of that would be most supported. England, however, was already a constitutional monarchy by this point and the Kings of England knew that they would never be able to assert absolute power again, which meant that those kings would want something slightly different than absolute monarchy, but not terribly different.
The European battles in the Indian Ocean most likely did not affect Asia. They sold and bought things they wanted
ellis island
The European battles in the Indian Ocean most likely did not affect Asia. They sold and bought things they wanted
the urban poor
America should support the goals of the French Revolution
Most likely it would have been China, not a European nation. The Portuguese first arrived in Japan in the year 1543.