Without compromise the states would not have come into agreement, especially about representation.
The phrase 'Nothing about us without us' was a slogan used to communicate the idea of representation of members affected by a policy to be decided on. It came from Central Europe during the 1500s, and helped transfer authority from the monarch to the parliament.
the colonist were upset because the british government, after being lenient, tried to enfore the stamp act and also raise taxes. When George the 3rd come to throne (in 1760) he had expanded restrictive trading. (the taxes were to help support the british troops in north america)
They felt isolated from England and increasingly drifted away from them. Mass propaganda from Revolutionaries also began to make the public believe the British Crown was screwing them over. Ironically enough, they always complained about "taxation without representation", yet if they had been given the opportunity to serve in the British Parliament, they would have declined the offer.
They help the House and the Senate come to an agreement.
Taxation without representation has happened throughout history. "No taxation without representation" was a slogan originating here during the 1750s and 1760s in what is now the United States that summarized a primary grievance of the Thirteen Colonies, which was one of the major rallying cries of the American Revolution. It had been in use for some years before this in Ireland.
There are many slogans such as "Give me liberty or give me death!" or "United we stand, divided we fall" you just have to look up some and presto there you have tons and tons of slogans! Also, theres books you can read.
The primary reason is that Britain continually and increasingly taxed the colonists on common goods that they grew(Sugar, Tobacco etc.) without providing the colonists representation in Parliament; the colonists were taxed without providing consent. This has come to be known as 'taxation without representation'. I should note, that in defence of Britain, the colonists weren't taxed at all before this, so it is not as though taxes were suddenly and unreasonably raised beyond levels that they could afford.
Without compromise the states would not have come into agreement, especially about representation.
Direct democracy is a democracy without representation, it was first practiced in ancient Athens.
Because people come from various culture group, they will view the representations in different way.
Taxation and gold mining
The tone of a terse statement is brief, concise, and lacking in detail or elaboration. It may come across as blunt or to the point, conveying the message without unnecessary words.
Taxes were placed on almost anything resource or supply that did not come from Britain. When the colonies wanted to trade with other countries Britain made sure to charge a tax so it might make them trade back with Britain as it would be cheaper. This simply infringed on what they believed in.
James Otis (February 5, 1725 - May 23, 1783) was a member of the Massachusetts Legislature and one of the foremost voices of the American Revolution. His precise phrase was "[t]axation without representation is tyranny." The roots of this phrase arise from various attempts by Parliament, in the name of the British Crown, to impose taxes (such as the hugely unpopular Stamp Act and, later, Tea Tax) on the American Colonies, to help meet the costs of the American Indian War and other military conflicts, both in North America and elsewhere. These efforts at taxation marked a sharp departure from the prior policy of "salutary neglect," which permitted the Colonies to generally manage their own affairs, without interference from London, including on the issue of taxation. Many colonialists, and especially the educated classes, bristled at the imposition of these new taxes and the other attempts by Parliament to extract greater wealth out of the Colonies in order to help pay for the large debts incurred in battling the French. They especially objected to the fact that unlike British subjects in Britain, they were being taxed without representation in Parliament, which they regarded as a manifest violation of "the rights of Englishmen." Many colonialists thus came to see London's efforts at taxation as tyranny, and proof that Parliament regarded the American Colonies no differently than Great Britain's other imperial holdings, despite that fact that American Colonies were largely peopled by the descendants of British subjects, all of whom before the Revolutionary War regarded themselves as British. Following the imposition of the tea tax, a group of disaffected colonialists, dressed as American Indians, raided ships of the British East India Company docked in Boston Harbor, Massachusetts, and threw the crates of tea stowed below decks overboard, in what would come to be known as the Boston Tea Party. It marked one of the major stepping stones to the Declaration of Independence in 1776 and the break away of the Colonies from Great Britain.
why does come negative balance in taxation
The Bank of England in London and the Royal Mint in Cardiff.