john Locke thought no government can exist without the consent of the governed.
Beveridge argues that government action without the consent of the governed undermines the fundamental principles of democracy and individual rights. Consent is essential for legitimacy; when people are not consulted or represented, it leads to a disconnect between the government and its citizens. This lack of consent can result in oppression and a loss of trust in governmental institutions, highlighting the need for participatory governance. Ultimately, Beveridge advocates for a system where the voices and choices of the populace guide governmental decisions.
(apex) Answer: He says some people are not capable of self-government.
Government officials can't accept positions without Congress' consent.
No. That idea went out of the window in the aftermath of the fall of the Berlin wall.
A government can be dissolved when it no longer benefits and follows the will of the people it governs (ex. making laws without the consent of the people.)
Consent of the governed matters because if the governed people do not consent to the governing body, they will revolt against it. It is also considered unjust to rule over people without their consent.
Consent of the governed matters because if the governed people do not consent to the governing body, they will revolt against it. It is also considered unjust to rule over people without their consent.
John Locke
He says that some people are not capable of self-government and pointed out that the United States already does it with Native Americans.
Yes it's essential in a democracy; without consent there'd be no authority.
He compares the people of the Philippines to children who are governed without consent
The political scientist you are referring to is likely Thomas Hobbes, not John Locke, who authored "Two Treatises of Government." Hobbes believed that a strong, centralized authority was necessary to maintain order and prevent chaos, arguing that a social contract justified the state's power over individuals. He contended that government could exist without the consent of the governed, as the primary purpose of the state was to ensure security and stability. In contrast, Locke emphasized the importance of consent and natural rights in his political philosophy.
the consent of the governed
(apex) Answer: He says some people are not capable of self-government.
Government officials can't accept positions without Congress' consent.
He pointed out that the United States already does this with Native Americans. He also compared the people in the Philippines to children, who are governed without consent.
Officials of the US government may not accept a gift or position with a foreign government without the consent of the Congress.