0
Whom does the system of checks and balances give the authority to confirm judges?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
The Legislative Branch; U.S. Congress.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Wiki User
∙ 11y agopresident
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which of the following is an example of the constitution's system of checks and balances?
The President would nominate judges, but the Senate has to approve them. (Nova Net)
What system helps prevent any of the three branches of US government from becoming too powerful?
The system of checks and balances. The Legislative Branch can write legislation. The Executive Branch can veto laws passed by the Legislative Branch. The Legislative Branch can override the veto. The Judicial Branch can rule on the constitutionality of laws. The Executive Branch appoints important judges. The appointments have to be approved by the Legislative Branch.
Which principle grants the President the authority to appoint federal judges?
The Constitution of The United States of America gives him that right, under the "advice and consent" clause of Article II. Presidential appointment and Senate approval are part of the system of checks and balances. As a further check, the US Senate must confirm such appointments in order for them to take effect.
What is the independence of judicial branch ensured by?
The independence of the judicial branch is ensured by checks and balances. Checks and balances ensures that all three branches of government have power, but not too much. It gives all branches independence, but prevents control by a single branch. Article 3, Section 1
Give 4 examples of checks and balances?
Executive on Legislative: Veto a bill Legislative on Executive: Override the veto with a two-thirds vote Legislative on Judicial: Can impeach judges; approves appointment of judges Executive on Judicial: Appoints judges Judicial on Executive/Legislative: Can declare acts/laws unconstitutional Hope I helped! :)
To whom does the system of check and balances give the authority to confirm judges?
president
In the checks and balances of the 1787 constitution federal judges?
The first federal judges (justices of the Supreme Court) were appointed as a result of the Judiciary Act of 1789. There were no federal judges in 1787; therefore, there were no checks and balances to worry about.
Why are judges appointed instead of elected?
The constitution makes it so with checks and balances.
Is an example of the Constitution system of checks and balances?
The president would nominate judges, but the senate hasn’t to approve them
Is an example of the constitution's system of checks and balances?
The president would nominate judges, but the senate hasn’t to approve them
Is an example of constitution's system of checks and balances?
The president would nominate judges, but the senate hasn’t to approve them
Which of the following is an example of the constitution's system of checks and balances?
The President would nominate judges, but the Senate has to approve them. (Nova Net)
What did critics say about FDR's court-packing plan?
It would disrupt the checks and balances of the government's branches.
How the executives controls the legislature and the judiciary?
Under checks and balances system of constitution, executive branch "checks" legislative branch through veto power. Executive branch "checks" judicial branch through appointment power (appointing judges/justices).
What system helps prevent any of the three branches of US government from becoming too powerful?
The system of checks and balances. The Legislative Branch can write legislation. The Executive Branch can veto laws passed by the Legislative Branch. The Legislative Branch can override the veto. The Judicial Branch can rule on the constitutionality of laws. The Executive Branch appoints important judges. The appointments have to be approved by the Legislative Branch.
Is the judicial branch part of the constitutions checks and balances?
Yes the judicial branch is part of the Constitution's check's and balances. It allows bad laws passed by Congress and signed by the President to be declared unConstitutional. And the President chooses future judges but they have to be approved by Congress.
What was a criticism of Roosevelt's Court- packing plan?
The criticism was that the President tried to influence the Supreme Court's jurisdiction by adding to the number of judges with candidates sympathetic to Roosevelt's New Deal initiatives. Roosevelt's argument was that that the Constitution does not limit the number of Supreme Court judges, so that he was perfectly entitled to propose legislation to add to their number. In the end, Congress put the proposal on the back burner and Roosevelt saw his problem solved by one of the Supreme Court judges moving over to the pro-New Deal side of the Court, thereby giving it a majority.
