answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The Legislative Branch; U.S. Congress.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

president

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Whom does the system of checks and balances give the authority to confirm judges?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about American Government

Which of the following is an example of the constitution's system of checks and balances?

The President would nominate judges, but the Senate has to approve them. (Nova Net)


What system helps prevent any of the three branches of US government from becoming too powerful?

The system of checks and balances. The Legislative Branch can write legislation. The Executive Branch can veto laws passed by the Legislative Branch. The Legislative Branch can override the veto. The Judicial Branch can rule on the constitutionality of laws. The Executive Branch appoints important judges. The appointments have to be approved by the Legislative Branch.


Which principle grants the President the authority to appoint federal judges?

The Constitution of The United States of America gives him that right, under the "advice and consent" clause of Article II. Presidential appointment and Senate approval are part of the system of checks and balances. As a further check, the US Senate must confirm such appointments in order for them to take effect.


What is the independence of judicial branch ensured by?

The independence of the judicial branch is ensured by checks and balances. Checks and balances ensures that all three branches of government have power, but not too much. It gives all branches independence, but prevents control by a single branch. Article 3, Section 1


Give 4 examples of checks and balances?

Executive on Legislative: Veto a bill Legislative on Executive: Override the veto with a two-thirds vote Legislative on Judicial: Can impeach judges; approves appointment of judges Executive on Judicial: Appoints judges Judicial on Executive/Legislative: Can declare acts/laws unconstitutional Hope I helped! :)

Related questions

To whom does the system of check and balances give the authority to confirm judges?

president


In the checks and balances of the 1787 constitution federal judges?

The first federal judges (justices of the Supreme Court) were appointed as a result of the Judiciary Act of 1789. There were no federal judges in 1787; therefore, there were no checks and balances to worry about.


Why are judges appointed instead of elected?

The constitution makes it so with checks and balances.


Is an example of the Constitution system of checks and balances?

The president would nominate judges, but the senate hasn’t to approve them


Is an example of the constitution's system of checks and balances?

The president would nominate judges, but the senate hasn’t to approve them


Is an example of constitution's system of checks and balances?

The president would nominate judges, but the senate hasn’t to approve them


Which of the following is an example of the constitution's system of checks and balances?

The President would nominate judges, but the Senate has to approve them. (Nova Net)


What did critics say about FDR's court-packing plan?

It would disrupt the checks and balances of the government's branches.


How the executives controls the legislature and the judiciary?

Under checks and balances system of constitution, executive branch "checks" legislative branch through veto power. Executive branch "checks" judicial branch through appointment power (appointing judges/justices).


What system helps prevent any of the three branches of US government from becoming too powerful?

The system of checks and balances. The Legislative Branch can write legislation. The Executive Branch can veto laws passed by the Legislative Branch. The Legislative Branch can override the veto. The Judicial Branch can rule on the constitutionality of laws. The Executive Branch appoints important judges. The appointments have to be approved by the Legislative Branch.


The new Russian constitution greatly enhanced the powers?

of the President by allowing them to serve additional terms and providing them with the authority to appoint key government officials, judges, and regional governors. This has been seen as a consolidation of power within the executive branch and a potential threat to the system of checks and balances in Russia.


Is the judicial branch part of the constitutions checks and balances?

Yes the judicial branch is part of the Constitution's check's and balances. It allows bad laws passed by Congress and signed by the President to be declared unConstitutional. And the President chooses future judges but they have to be approved by Congress.