Theoretically, competition keeps prices low because various firms vie for the business of consumers. When they compete, they attempt to win a larger market share by lowering prices. Therefore, if competition is lacking, prices will increase.
Take a monopoly for example. No competition means they can set really high prices.
Theoretically, competition keeps prices low because various firms vie for the business of consumers. When they compete, they attempt to win a larger market share by lowering prices. Therefore, if competition is lacking, prices will increase.
Producers are driven by the profit motive to work against competition
They wrote with fountain pens that had to be dipped in inkwells or filled I believe. Mostly they would dip them in inkwells.
James Madison had the belief that by instilling a democratic form of government in the United States that the farmers and business owners would learn to work together for the best interests of the country. Many people believe that the US government does work as Madison claimed it would.
what did henry whitfield believe would help mississippians improve their lives
In a charter colony all the people who selected the Governor had a say in all the matters, so any promblem could be delt by the people and revolutions would have been avoided.
because your father lacked competition with your mom, i knew it hurt her so i banged her :D
Less sunlight would likely result in fewer producers. A decrease in producers would cause greater competition among consumers for the decreased food supply.
It is nothing more then a myth and a marketing gimmick used by various people to create instant consumers (consumers here refer to ppl who would consume the information)
no
I believe Primary. Not absolutely sure.
Ruthless business people would lower their prices to put their competition out of business. Once their competition was gone, they would raise their prices.
It is not certain that anyone's profits will eventually be eliminated by competition; it is in the nature of competition that you have a chance of winning, as well as a chance of losing. And lots of people enjoy competition.
The most balanced phrase ever: "Do on to others as you would have done on to you" I believe 99% of the people would abide by this. Money is the obstacle. Money makes things unfair and competative. Competition makes the power which is a never ending cycle.
A standards-setting body would be better. They would be independent from the phone companies - and thus have the consumers interests. Competition between companies simply 'squeezes out' those who refuse to conform with the majority decisions.
People who would believe in him. Could be anyone.
Social Darwinists believed that individuals and societies competed in a struggle for existence, where only the fittest would survive and prosper. They applied Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection to human societies, arguing that government intervention in social and economic affairs would interfere with this natural process and hinder progress. This belief system justified practices such as laissez-faire capitalism and imperialism.
supposedly nothing.