The Mayflower Compact, signed in 1620 by the Pilgrims aboard the Mayflower, was significant because it established a framework for self-governance in the New World. This agreement created a form of social contract, emphasizing the principles of majority rule and collective decision-making. It laid the groundwork for future democratic governance in America, influencing later constitutional frameworks and reinforcing the idea of government based on the consent of the governed. Ultimately, it marked a crucial step toward democratic principles that would shape the nation.
No, because England had mistreated the colonists, and would have done the same no matter what.
No. The usual thinking is that about one-third of the colonists supported independence, about one-third opposed it, and the other third had no strong opinion on the matter.
Answer this question… It was the first government framework written and voted on in North America.
That question is a matter of opinion.
No, he was simply the British King. By this time in History government was being devolved to ministers and parliament. Although King George II was the last British King to lead his troops in battle (Minden, Germany 1759) the effects of the American Revolution on George III were probably a matter of an insignificant colony a very long way away. Although he may well be the focus of the Colonists discontent, I do not think that the King was the cause of it. Obviously the war of revolution was fought against the British Crown, the British & Loyalist forces in North America would believe their fight was a 'legal' one, the colonists thought different.
Prior to the Revolution, the American colonists had no say at all in the any matter regarding taxes. Taxes were determined by Parliament and were approved by the King.
Prior to the Revolution, the American colonists had no say at all in the any matter regarding taxes. Taxes were determined by Parliament and were approved by the King.
The fact that it was a battle does not matter. The American victory in the Battle of Saratoga convinced the French to support the colonists bid for independence.
Since it is capitalized I'm assuming you mean the boat, since it is a name, it stays the same no matter what language. The word for mayflower(type of flower) is "muguete"
The Stamp Act levied this tax, and it made the colonists very angry since they had no say in the matter. The Stamp Act quickly became one of the reasons many of the colonists wanted independence from England.The Stamp Act levied this tax, and it made the colonists very angry since they had no say in the matter. The Stamp Act quickly became one of the reasons many of the colonists wanted independence from England.The Stamp Act levied an internal tax on various documents and articles in the American colonies.
No, because England had mistreated the colonists, and would have done the same no matter what.
The British had imposed a number of taxes upon the American colonists without allowing them to be represented in British parliament, and therefore having no say in the matter. As Patrick Henry put it, "No taxation without representation!"
One thing that happens is that the molecules in the matter lose energy and momentum and slow down, therefore the matter becomes more compact.
The Stamp Act levied this tax, and it made the colonists very angry since they had no say in the matter. The Stamp Act quickly became one of the reasons many of the colonists wanted independence from England.The Stamp Act levied this tax, and it made the colonists very angry since they had no say in the matter. The Stamp Act quickly became one of the reasons many of the colonists wanted independence from England.The Stamp Act levied an internal tax on various documents and articles in the American colonies.
Generally the solid phase is more compact.
The sad fact is that when we discuss compact matter, we're playing with quantum gravity, postulated particles, and a weirdness that uses multiple and compound infinities. However: Propose, that we have more states of matter than many of our best physicists wish to concede for personal reasons. At the beginning, let us consider compact matter. Bars and Svetcos pounded their theory into a plowshare ten years ago, but here are the essentials. Compact matter takes form as a field that lacks all the features associated with baryonic matter. It is of infinite density, C becomes infinite, and this state of matter is purely energetic. We have deduced its presence in deep space by gravitational lensing. Where one would expect MACHO's (Massive Compact Halo Objects) to show a four-pronged gravitational lensing effect, cosmic superstrings show a two-pronged lensing effect. In either case, the gravitation exhibited is consistent with black hole singularities. Compton began work on compact matter as part of his expanding universe theory. He theorized that compact matter sheds "fibers into the void of pure vacuum and it then becomes De Sitter space, with a nonzero mass . . .." Hawking then completed Compton's incomplete theory, and was privileged to name that radiation after himself. (See Hawking Radiation). We may surmise that compact matter is purely energetic, has sufficient gravity to deflect photons traveling near C, and is linked to De Sitter space.
Doesn't matter - they all share information now.