The framers of the Constitution created a system of checks and balances so that one branch does not have too much power over the others. Each branch of government checks the power of the other branches. For example, after Congress approves a bill, it also has to be approved by the president, but if the Supreme Court believes that the bill is unconstitutional, they are able to overturn it. This system was created so that one branch does not grab all of the power and take control of the country, like we see in dictatorships.
Look at it this way. If every grower in the country plants nothing but corn, the overall health of the people will plummet rapidly.
The framers of the Constitution did not want the new government to become a Dictatorship. Dictatorships only have one leader and power goes unchecked.
A lot of them in democracies have this set up. This helps to make sure that one person does not get all of the power.
There is no one clause addressing national (federal) government power. Practically the entire document is a collection of limits and blocks, and checks and balances set upon the power and authority of the federal government.
The groups that controlled the drafting of new state constitutions in the south in 1867 were the Republicans and two important provisions in these constitutions were that public schools were set up and the vote was gave to all adult males.
In order to assure the federal government did not monopolize all of the powers, a separation of powers was established, and a system of checks and balances were set in place. Each of the branches of government, executive, legislative and judicial, possess the power to check the others.
The federal government serves the principle stated in the preamble by maintaining a system of checks and balances. The government ensures that no one entity has to much power, and that there are laws in place to prevent discrimination on any basis.
A lot of them in democracies have this set up. This helps to make sure that one person does not get all of the power.
Checks and balances were set up by the American constitution to ensure no one branch of government could become too powerful.
the founding fathers set up the checks and balances so that no particular branch of the governemtn got too powerful. checks and balances pretty much make the branches of government enemies of each other because in order to get anything done, you have to go through the other brnches.
The president's veto power is a feature of the system of checks and balances set up in the US Constitution. The Constitution of the United States was created on September 17, 1787.
The federal government has 3 parts, or branches. To make sure that no one branch has too much power, the U.S. constitution set up a system of, "checks and balances" . Each branch may use its powers to check or limit the power's of the other two.
Your Answer: Checks And Balances
checks and balances.
The Checks and Balances system set up in the US constitution.
There was a system of checks and balances set up. This system prevented one branch of the government from becoming too powerful.
One synonym for the division of powers is known as the system of checks and balances. It is the way the government of the United States is set up.
It allows that no branch can become too powerful. It relates to the Constitution because it helps set up our government
Both Washington and Jefferson aided in setting up the Government we are currently under. So obviously they both agreed in checks and balances as neither wanted America to have a King such as as Great Britain. The office of President was originally going to be weak, but was redefined with Washington in mind. The Presidential office was set up to be the Leader, not the Ruler. Congress and the Supreme Court was the check and balance to Presidential power. Even though it was set up for the President to be able to VETO a law by Congress, Congress was also given the power to override the President, just as the Supreme Court is limited by the Constitution.