executive power
false it was the concentration of too much power. novanet !
orginially the house was the only national legislative body directly representative of the people. The idea of this power to the house was to reflect the power of the people. The senate was to act in the interest of the states. The politics behind their findings from the impeachment trial would also be less likely to be influenced by politics since they are elected for a six year term. The overreaching idea is that Madison drafted a plan to ensure checks and balances in various powers of government
The Senate shall have the sole power to try all impeachments. Basically, the House serves as a grand jury that may indict an office holder. The Senate conducts the actual trial. The framers intentionally split these duties between the houses because the House is less exclusive. The Senate members serve longer terms (less elections) and are for that reason more resistant to the frequent whims of the people and thus are less likely to convict office holders and remove them from office based on fickle passions and witch-hunts. The thought is that Senators are more reasoned. An indictment can be conducted by passionate congressmen because their decisions are checked by the cool deliberation of the Senate.
kick rocks
the power of commerce and the power to tax
executive power
Cool
The Framers thought that the government was too weak and they wanted to give it more power than the states.
The framers gave the House of Representatives the power to elect the next president in the case that none of the candidates received a clear majority. They did this because the House, also called the lower house, was elected directly by the people. This meant the congressmen represented the current public opinion. Initially, the Constitution specified that state legislatures would elect the upper house (the Senate) and this was only changed in 1913 with the adoption of the 17th Amendment.
No man can be omnipotent and give more power to the people.
Because that's what it says in the Constitution. If you mean "why does the Constitution grant them in particular that power," the answer is along the lines of "why not?"To achieve balance of power, the Framers felt there must be a way for the legislature to remove the president from office. They decided to give the power to bring charges to the House while the actual trial would be conducted by the Senate.
The framers were the people in colonial America responsible for what rules the country would be run on. The framers held that a contract exist between the senate and the house of representatives.
i think they checked judicial power..
The Articles of the Confederation is what the framers based its decisions to deny currency power. currency power is the ability to regulate money.
The Framers didn't have differing views on Presidential power; instead, they believed the Executive branch should be "checked."
false it was the concentration of too much power. novanet !