answersLogoWhite

0

The Roman government lost the support of the people due to a combination of political corruption, economic inequality, and social unrest. Widespread corruption among politicians undermined public trust, while the growing wealth gap between the elite and the poor led to discontent. Additionally, frequent wars and military failures placed a heavy burden on the populace, exacerbating their grievances. These factors contributed to a decline in civic pride and loyalty to the state.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1w ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Did the roman government lose the support of the people?

Yess


Why did Romans lose interest in the government?

The Roman Pensants lost interest in government because of the wide spread disease and famine.


People who do not vote lose their?

voice in government


Why did the American government eventually lose public support of its war efforts in Vietnam?

The draft.


Why do people lose jobs because of the economy?

Because there is not enough money to support all of the people working there so the people lose their jobs.


Why did the government lose money during the fall of the roman empire?

There is no record of the government losing money during the fall of the western part of the Roman empire (the eastern part of this empire continued to exist for 1,000 years).


What happens to Carthage after they lose to Romans?

The people were sold into slavery and retired Roman military veterans were settled there.


Why is the government worried about Swine Flu?

I feel that are worried because they will lose money that we have to pay to the government. because if people start dying that means the government loses people people pay fore things like taxes.


In 1937 what misstep caused president roosevelt to lose the support of some people within his own party and many people in the general public?

Wpa


What might happen if the government did not insure bank deposits?

people would lose their savings if their banks went out of business


In which type of government does the people rule and hold soverign?

You make me lose hope. Democracy seems to ring a bell.


Why did congress refuse to pass anti-lynching laws during the progressive era?

First off, they could not get enough votes from officials against lynching. Also, they did not want to lose the support from those who supported. IF these people turned on the government, then future progressive legislation would be much harder to pass. You can compare it to Lincoln's decision to not pass anti-slavery laws during that era. He did not want to lose the support of the southern officials.