Because there has never been a consensus on writing one. The UK has had stable government for centuries relying on conventions. A written constitution doesn't always make for stable, democratic or good governance (just look at Africa) and constitutions are often used by dictators to justify their actions.
Instead of a written constitution, Great Britain has traditions. When traditions are respected, they work just as well as a written constitution.
The UK has no written constitution.
Nothing. It's written.
Yes. No.
Loose collection of documents, law and norms, composed of Magna Carta, Bill of RIghts and Common Law.
Arthur Lehman Goodhart has written: 'The British constitution' -- subject(s): England, Great Britain, Great Britain. Parliament
Britain doesn't have a written constitution but English law is based on the 1215 Magna Carta (Great Charter).
The Constitution was written first. The Constitution was written, signed, and sent to the states for ratification. The battle for ratification in New York was fierce, and the Papers were written to convince people that the Constitution was the way to go.
Philip Pusey has written: 'The new constitution' -- subject(s): Constitutional history, Politics and government, Great Britain, Great Britain. Parliament, Reform
The UK does not have a single, written document that they call their constitution. Instead, they have something called an 'uncodified constitution': a collection of customs, statutes, precedents, etc. that together form the fundamental rules of government.
see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Articles_of_Confederation
William Reynell Anson has written: 'The law and custom of the constitution ..' -- subject(s): Accessible book, Great Britain