it is a primary source because it wasnt real
Primary Source
yes
It is a primary source because we can read it and see what they wanted to do in governance of their colony.
The Mayflower Compact is a primary source because it is an original document created by the Pilgrims in 1620, outlining their governance and social contract for the Plymouth Colony. As a firsthand account of the settlers' intentions and agreements, it provides direct evidence of early American political organization and community values. This historical artifact offers insights into the principles of self-governance and democracy that would influence future American political thought.
A letter is a primary source.
Primary Source
yes
yes
The Mayflower compact.
The Mayflower Compact is a primary source document because it was created by the passengers aboard the Mayflower in 1620. It directly reflects their intentions and agreements when establishing their government in the New World.
The Mayflower Compact
Yes because a primary source mean that an author directly states his opinion or facts he has found.hen
It is a primary source because we can read it and see what they wanted to do in governance of their colony.
It is a primary source because we can read it and see what they wanted to do in governance of their colony.
The Mayflower Compact is a primary source because it is an original document created by the Pilgrims in 1620, outlining their governance and social contract for the Plymouth Colony. As a firsthand account of the settlers' intentions and agreements, it provides direct evidence of early American political organization and community values. This historical artifact offers insights into the principles of self-governance and democracy that would influence future American political thought.
A letter is a primary source.
A primary source that can be challenging to read due to archaic language is the Mayflower Compact, signed in 1620 by the Pilgrims. Written in Early Modern English, it outlines the framework for governance in the New World but can be difficult for contemporary readers to understand. Additionally, accounts of Pocahontas's story, particularly those from the early 17th century, often use antiquated language and cultural references that may confuse modern audiences. These sources provide valuable insights into early American history despite their linguistic challenges.