0
Why is totalitarian often considered to be more efficient at making decisions then a democratic one?
In a totalitarian society one person is in charge. This person is called a dictator and there is no freedom of voting, expression, art, press, or personal decisions. Every thing in the society is controlled. In a democracy it is the opposite. People are allowed to vote, protest, create, and make decisions that are best for them.
What else can I help you with?
Why would totalitarian government be considered to be more efficient at making decisions then the democratic one?
Totalitarian governments can be considered more efficient at making decisions because they centralize power in the hands of a single leader or a small ruling elite, which allows for quick and decisive action without the delays of debate and consensus-building characteristic of democratic systems. This streamlined decision-making process can facilitate rapid implementation of policies, especially in times of crisis. Additionally, totalitarian regimes often suppress dissent and alternative viewpoints, which can further expedite the decision-making process. However, this efficiency often comes at the cost of individual freedoms and rights.
What are the benefits and risks of interdependence?
If interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. The advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). As the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. In the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "Master-Slave". Generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary. If one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. The extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.
Why in representatives are elected for a fixed period of time?
Members are elected for a fixed period so that people can use their preferences again after 5 years to elect their member. This is required for efficient working in a democratic system. Moreover, in democracy people have right to express their choices and elect their leaders which will not be possible unless they are elected for a fixed period.
What type of government elects a small group of representatives to represent a larger group?
The type of government that elects a small group of representatives to represent a larger group is called a representative democracy. In this system, citizens vote for officials who make decisions and pass laws on their behalf. This contrasts with direct democracy, where citizens participate directly in decision-making. Representative democracy allows for more efficient governance, especially in larger populations.
What was the original purpose of the U.S. Court of Appeals?
The original purpose of the U.S. Court of Appeals, established by the Judiciary Act of 1891, was to alleviate the caseload of the Supreme Court by serving as an intermediate appellate court. It aimed to provide a more efficient means for reviewing decisions made by lower federal courts, ensuring that legal matters could be resolved more swiftly and effectively. Additionally, it was designed to provide uniformity in the interpretation of federal law across different jurisdictions.
Why would a totalitarian government would be considered to be more efficient at making decisions than a democratic one?
Simply because there are fewer impediments to passing laws
Why would totalitarian government be considered to be more efficient at making decisions then the democratic one?
Totalitarian governments can be considered more efficient at making decisions because they centralize power in the hands of a single leader or a small ruling elite, which allows for quick and decisive action without the delays of debate and consensus-building characteristic of democratic systems. This streamlined decision-making process can facilitate rapid implementation of policies, especially in times of crisis. Additionally, totalitarian regimes often suppress dissent and alternative viewpoints, which can further expedite the decision-making process. However, this efficiency often comes at the cost of individual freedoms and rights.
Why is a totalitarian government often considered to be more efficient at making decisions?
A totalitarian government is often considered more efficient at making decisions because it centralizes authority, allowing for swift implementation of policies without the delays associated with democratic processes, such as debate and consensus-building. This concentration of power can enable rapid responses to crises and the ability to mobilize resources quickly. However, this efficiency often comes at the cost of individual freedoms and can lead to poor decision-making due to a lack of accountability and diverse perspectives.
Why is totalitarian government often considered to be more efficient at making decisions than a democratic one?
Totalitarian states are much much quicker at making decisions, because those that do not agree have the good sense not to mention it. Hitler was renowned for ignoring his Generals and often paid the price. Just because they can make decisions quickly does not mean it is the right one.
Why would totalitarian government be considered to be more efficient at making decisions than a democratic one?
Totalitarian governments can be considered more efficient at making decisions because they centralize power in a single authority, allowing for quick and decisive action without the need for lengthy debates or consensus-building. This streamlined decision-making process can enable rapid responses to crises and the implementation of policies without opposition. In contrast, democratic systems often require extensive consultation, negotiation, and compromise, which can slow down the decision-making process. However, this efficiency often comes at the cost of individual freedoms and public participation in governance.
Why is a totalitarians government often considered to be more efficient at making decisions than a democratic government?
Simply because there are fewer impediments to passing laws
Why are the capital markets of the United States considered to be the most efficient in the world?
One reason for the efficient operation of these markets has been the public availability of creditable financial statements by those using them as a basis for their investment and credit decisions.
Why must economic decisions be efficient?
so that the income or benefits gained than the cost are
Characteristics of production and operations management decisions?
Making decisions that help make business more efficient are part of production and operations management. Other characteristics include conscientious and tactical decisions.
In a city of 200000 people what democratic form of governance would be the most efficient?
In a city of 200,000 people, a representative democracy would likely be the most efficient form of governance. This system allows citizens to elect representatives who make decisions on their behalf, reducing the administrative burden and ensuring that decisions are made by individuals who have the time and expertise to do so. Additionally, representative democracies typically have checks and balances in place to prevent dictatorship or abuse of power.
What fossil fuel is considered to be the most efficient?
oil
How will this database help the school principal make efficient and effective decisions regarding the operation of the school?
yes
